From mark@hamel-noyes.com Sun Oct 30 19:29:03 2005 Return-path: Envelope-to: RMSA@Menschel.net Delivery-date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:28:21 -0800 Received: from [127.127.127.127] (helo=pascal.ctyme.com) by newton.ctyme.com with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EWQLM-0003K3-W9 for RMSA@Menschel.net; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:28:21 -0800 Received: from mail by pascal.ctyme.com with ctyme-spam-scanned (Exim 4.54) id 1EWQLL-0006n2-Vr for RMSA@Menschel.net; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:28:20 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on pascal.ctyme.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_OIMO, SP_HAM_SUPER,SUBJ_GROUP autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from sitemail2.everyone.net ([216.200.145.36] helo=omta18.mta.everyone.net) by pascal.ctyme.com with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EWQLL-0006mY-Lp for RMSA@Menschel.net; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:28:19 -0800 Received: from dm16.mta.everyone.net (bigiplb-dsnat [172.16.0.19]) by omta18.mta.everyone.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E138402A6 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:28:16 -0800 (PST) X-Eon-Dm: dm16 Received: from ourpc (151.199.35.93 [151.199.35.93]) by dm16.mta.everyone.net (EON-AUTHRELAY2) with ESMTP id dm16.435c5781.e63a2 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:28:16 -0800 (PST) X-Eon-Sig: AQG+bOxDZY9QwSYxkQIAAAAB,c75447af424537d909c0094c7b4d091e From: "Mark Noyes" To: RMSA@Menschel.net Subject: RE: [Bug 4652] __OIMO_MSGID header pattern is not correct Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 22:28:14 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <4652.4364F8F1.B11CB4F8.dev@spamassassin.apache.org> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spamfilter-host: pascal.ctyme.com - http://www.junkemailfilter.com" X-Mail-from: mark@hamel-noyes.com X-Fingerprint: mark@hamel-noyes.com-127.127 Bob, I reported it against all hardware and O/S because the error occurs in the rule file. I reported it against 2.0, but should have reported it against 3.0 - I was operating from faulty memory. Sorry for the confusion. Outlook reports that it is version 9.0.0.2711 This mail was sent from the Outlook system in question. -- Mark -----Original Message----- From: nobody@ajax.apache.org [mailto:nobody@ajax.apache.org]On Behalf Of bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.spamassassin.org Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 11:47 AM To: mark@hamel-noyes.com Subject: [Bug 4652] __OIMO_MSGID header pattern is not correct http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4652 Bob@Menschel.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |triage ------- Additional Comments From Bob@Menschel.net 2005-10-30 17:46 ------- Mark, You flag this as "all" hardware and O/s, but version 2.0 of SA? Can you please let us know which version of MS Outlook 2000 this is? Can you send an email to me at RMSA@Menschel.net, from that Outlook 2k system, so I can attach a sample email with headers as an example we can test against? Thanks. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.