Bug 1334 - WebCam Girls should get more points
Summary: WebCam Girls should get more points
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Spamassassin
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Rules (Eval Tests) (show other bugs)
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Hardware: All All
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: 3.0.0
Assignee: SpamAssassin Developer Mailing List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-01-01 17:37 UTC by Robert J. Accettura
Modified: 2003-01-01 21:10 UTC (History)
0 users


Attachment Type Modified Status Actions Submitter/CLA Status
Example email patch None Robert J. Accettura [NoCLA]
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Robert J. Accettura 2003-01-01 17:37:42 UTC 
Key words I have noticed:

cam
chat
free
talk
live
personal
girl


I'm suprised these never seem to trigger spamassassin to a 5.0.  

I'm attaching a sample now, and will attempt to remember to attach more as I
recieve them.
Comment 1 Robert J. Accettura 2003-01-01 17:38:09 UTC 
Created attachment 532 [details]
Example email
Comment 2 Robert J. Accettura 2003-01-01 17:38:59 UTC 
Corrected summary and changed target milestone
Comment 3 Theo Van Dinter 2003-01-01 20:50:17 UTC 
Subject: Re: [SAdev]  New: WebCam Girls should be get points

On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 05:37:43PM -0800, bugzilla-daemon@hughes-family.org wrote:
> Key words I have noticed:
> 
> cam > chat > free > talk > live > personal > girl
> 
> I'm suprised these never seem to trigger spamassassin to a 5.0.  

These will all be handled by the bayes system in 2.50.  If I could get
through to bugzilla I'd close the bug as 'wontfix'.

BTW:

0.329      223      529       96  personal
0.511       63       70       96  chat
0.674     1202      674      113  free
0.780       13        4       96  cam
0.476       18       23       96  girl
0.266       88      282       96  talk
0.645      272      174       96  live

So none of these words are strong indicators for me at least.
Comment 4 Allen Smith 2003-01-01 22:01:02 UTC 
> These will all be handled by the bayes system in 2.50.

Umm... it'll handle them as single words. Whether they are _together_
spam indicators is another question. I rather doubt the FPs would be worth
catching them, personally, but I certainly could be wrong.

     -Allen
Comment 5 Theo Van Dinter 2003-01-02 06:10:27 UTC 
well, it's presented as single words which is why I responded in fashion.  as 
phrases, perhaps, but there are reasons the spam phrases rules were disabled 
in 2.50.

btw: the attachment is not a valid message, it looks like it was edited in 
some windows software, then saved as rtf or something.