SA Bugzilla – Bug 1475
False positive: Juno relay
Last modified: 2003-05-24 09:44:09 UTC
Received an e-mail from user of Juno. Most likely sent message utilizing webmail.juno.com Message was mistakenly identified as being sent via a forged Juno relay. Full headers follow. Received: from webmail1.wlv.untd.com (outbound-16.wlv.untd.com [64.136.16.100]) by slate.Mines.EDU (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id h15N2Y0u121562 for <xxxxxxx@Mines.EDU>; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 16:02:34 -0700 Received: from cookie.juno.com by cookie.juno.com for <"K8bQIcH/5F84kCa+a5YOmR4GSd+PEpmETm8TgM9jIAa4M3w2CxSL9Q=="> Received: (from xxxxxxxxx@juno.com) by webmail1.wlv.untd.com (jqueuemail) id HQASNN23; Wed, 05 Feb 2003 15:02:17 PST X-Original-From: xxxxxxxxx@juno.com Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 23:01:48 GMT To: xxxxxxx@mines.edu Subject: *****SPAM***** Re:Re: Keeping Life Together X-Mailer: Juno Webmail Version 1.0 Received: from [12.84.119.204] by webmail1.wlv.untd.com X-Originating-IP: [12.84.119.204] From: xxxxxxxxx@juno.com Message-ID: <20030205.150217.531.92208@webmail1.wlv.untd.com> X-MailScanner: No currently known viruses detected (postmaster@Mines.EDU) X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=9.3 required=5.0 tests=DEAR_SOMEBODY,FORGED_JUNO_RCVD,FORGED_RCVD_FOUND, FORGED_RCVD_TRAIL,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,NO_REAL_NAME,ONLY_COST, SPAM_PHRASE_05_08,SUPERLONG_LINE version=2.43 X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Level: ********* X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.43 (1.115.2.20-2002-10-15-exp) X-Spam-Report: 9.30 hits, 5 required; * 1.3 -- From: does not include a real name * 0.9 -- From: ends in numbers * 0.8 -- Possibly-forged 'Received:' header found * 0.2 -- BODY: Only $$$ * 0.1 -- BODY: Contains 'Dear Somebody' * 1.6 -- BODY: Spam phrases score is 05 to 08 (medium) [score: 6] * 0.0 -- BODY: Contains a line >=199 characters long * 2.4 -- 'From' juno.com does not match 'Received' headers * 2.0 -- trail of Received: headers seems to be forged
It definitely appears to be a forged message. It looks like juno.com can't configure the mail servers to add Received: headers that make sense. a juno.com user -> webmail1.wlv.untd.com missing step ??? cookie.juno.com -> cookie.juno.com webmail1.wlv.untd.com -> slate.Mines.EDU untd.com appears to be the same company as juno.com Also, next time, please attach a complete example instead of cut-and-paste of headers. If you have additional examples, please attach them, they could be useful trying to figure out a work-around.
Created attachment 895 [details] redacted copy of msg that triggered Juno test falsely
added untd.com to the forged re.