SA Bugzilla – Bug 3179
failures in tests
Last modified: 2004-03-23 10:38:53 UTC
t/basic_lint................Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping: uridnsbl_timeout 2 Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping: uridnsbl URIBL_SBL sbl.spamhaus.org. TXT Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping: uridnsbl URIBL_DSBL list.dsbl.org. TXT Not found: anything = FAILED test 1 Failed 1/1 tests, 0.00% okay t/bayesdbm..................# Failed test 1 in t/SATest.pm at line 493
additional failures... t/rule_names................ Found anti-pattern: P_229 = GUARANTEE, # Failed test 257 in SATest.pm at line 501 Found anti-pattern: P_453 = OPPORTUNITY, # Failed test 556 in SATest.pm at line 501 fail #2 Found anti-pattern: P_1389 = OPT_IN_CAPS, # Failed test 559 in SATest.pm at line 501 fail #3 Found anti-pattern: P_677 = OPT_OUT_CAPS, # Failed test 561 in SATest.pm at line 501 fail #4 Found anti-pattern: P_398 = REMOVE_SUBJ, # Failed test 680 in SATest.pm at line 501 fail #5 Found anti-pattern: P_880 = REPLY_REMOVE_SUBJECT, # Failed test 681 in SATest.pm at line 501 fail #6 Found anti-pattern: P_795 = SUBJ_REMOVE, # Failed test 740 in SATest.pm at line 501 fail #7 Found anti-pattern: P_827 = T_TEXT_ONLY, # Failed test 1145 in SATest.pm at line 501 fail #8 FAILED tests 257, 556, 559, 561, 680-681, 740, 1145, 1409-1413 Failed 13/1413 tests, 99.08% okay
yeah, we know ;)
is there some reason why people aren't running the tests before making checkins?
the rule_names test is a "tracker" for something we have to fix before release, but which will have no effect on normal use -- it's catching cosmetic issues, essentially. The uridnsbl one was a failure I should have checked. my bad. it should be fixed by now.
fixed as of r9728