Bug 3658 - [review] SenderBase - no go
Summary: [review] SenderBase - no go
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Spamassassin
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Rules (Eval Tests) (show other bugs)
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Hardware: Other other
: P5 normal
Target Milestone: 3.0.0
Assignee: SpamAssassin Developer Mailing List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-08-03 17:35 UTC by Daniel Quinlan
Modified: 2004-08-04 12:20 UTC (History)
0 users


Attachment Type Modified Status Actions Submitter/CLA Status
proposed patch patch None Daniel Quinlan [HasCLA]
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Daniel Quinlan 2004-08-03 17:35:42 UTC 
IronPort has requested that we hold off on shipping with live
SenderBase rules at this time.
Comment 1 Daniel Quinlan 2004-08-03 17:37:05 UTC 
Created attachment 2210 [details]
proposed patch
Comment 2 Daniel Quinlan 2004-08-03 18:01:08 UTC 
3.0.0
Comment 3 Theo Van Dinter 2004-08-03 21:06:57 UTC 
hrm.

+score __SENDERBASE 0

does that actually work?
Comment 4 Justin Mason 2004-08-03 21:21:34 UTC 
I think so -- meta subrules are just real rules that aren't added to the output,
IIRC.
Comment 5 Justin Mason 2004-08-03 21:22:06 UTC 
+1
Comment 6 Theo Van Dinter 2004-08-03 21:33:04 UTC 
Subject: Re:  SenderBase - no go

On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 09:21:35PM -0700, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.spamassassin.org wrote:
> I think so -- meta subrules are just real rules that aren't added to the output,
> IIRC.

Hrm.  Seems hackish in a way, but reading the code does agree with
that assessment.

+1   :)
Comment 7 Daniel Quinlan 2004-08-03 21:35:08 UTC 
Subject: Re:  [review] SenderBase - no go

> Hrm.  Seems hackish in a way, but reading the code does agree with
> that assessment.
>
> +1   :)

It's documented that way too.

Daniel
Comment 8 Daniel Quinlan 2004-08-04 20:20:59 UTC 
applied, closing as fixed