Bug 3892 - Double Subject
Summary: Double Subject
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Spamassassin
Classification: Unclassified
Component: spamc/spamd (show other bugs)
Version: 2.63
Hardware: All other
: P5 normal
Target Milestone: Undefined
Assignee: SpamAssassin Developer Mailing List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-10-11 03:13 UTC by Alexander Hochhalter
Modified: 2004-10-11 03:15 UTC (History)
0 users


Attachment Type Modified Status Actions Submitter/CLA Status
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Alexander Hochhalter 2004-10-11 03:13:37 UTC 
hi,
twice (double) Subject :-(
Why?
-----------------------------vvvvv-----------------
Disclose-Recipients: No 
Language: English 
X-No-Archive: Yes 
Reply-To: "Marcel Reynolds" <hpcxjdzasueb@yahoo.com> 
From: "Marcel Reynolds" <hpcxjdzasueb@yahoo.com> 
To: info@seminarauskunft.ch, sales@seminarauskunft.ch 
Subject: [>>>>_SPAM_<<<<] 
Subject: 
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 04:55:09 -0400 
X-Spam-Flag: YES 
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=9.7 required=5.0 version=2.63-02 
X-Spam-Level: ********* 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-02 (2004-01-11) on archix.ordix.de 


Spam detection software, running on the system "archix.ordix.de", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
[service1@ordix.de] for details.


Content preview:  Hi again, Here is Marcel Reynolds. I wite you because
  we are accepting your mortgage application. Our office confirms you can
  get a $220.000 loÀn for a $352.00 per month payment. Approval process
  will take 1 minute, so please fill out the form on our website: [...] 


Content analysis details:   (9.7 points, 5.0 required)


 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.8 MORTGAGE_PITCH         BODY: Looks like mortgage pitch
 5.4 BAYES_99               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
                            [score: 1.0000]
 0.9 FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD      'From' yahoo.com does not match 'Received' headers
 0.1 RCVD_IN_NJABL          RBL: Received via a relay in dnsbl.njabl.org
                            [80.128.158.174 listed in dnsbl.njabl.org]
 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS          RBL: SORBS: sender is listed in SORBS
                            [80.128.158.174 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
 2.4 OPT_HEADER             Headers include an "opt"ed phrase


The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to
open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
or confirm that your address can receive spam.  If you wish to view
it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.


X-Envelope-From: <hpcxjdzasueb@yahoo.com>
X-Envelope-To: <sales@pop.ordix.de>
Received: from gw.ordix.de (gw.ordix.de [192.168.10.2]) by archix.ordix.de; 
Received: from mx-ha02.regio.net (mx-ha02.regionetworks.de [212.218.64.57])
        by gw.ordix.de (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i9A8ok2D003047;
        Sun, 10 Oct 2004 10:50:46 +0200
Received: from p50809eae.dip.t-dialin.net (p50809EAE.dip.t-dialin.net 
[80.128.158.174])
        by mx-ha02.regio.net (8.12.11/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id 
i9A8opt4015388;
        Sun, 10 Oct 2004 10:50:52 +0200
Message-Id: <200410100850.i9A8opt4015388@mx-ha02.regio.net>
Disclose-Recipients: No
Language: English
X-No-Archive: Yes
Reply-To: "Marcel Reynolds" <hpcxjdzasueb@yahoo.com>
From: "Marcel Reynolds" <hpcxjdzasueb@yahoo.com>
To: info@seminarauskunft.ch, sales@seminarauskunft.ch
Subject: 
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 04:55:09 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
        boundary="--53697898549562098"


Hi again,


Here is Marcel Reynolds. I wite you because we are accepting your mortgage 
application.
Our office confirms you can get a $220.000 loÀn for a $352.00 per month payment.
Approval process will take 1 minute, so please fill out the form on our website:


http://burglary.moneyintelligent.info/s6/jj.php?weo=101




Thank you.


Best Regards Marcel Reynolds
First Account Manager
Comment 1 Theo Van Dinter 2004-10-11 05:46:55 UTC 
Hi,

As per the notice when you opened the ticket, messages should be attached via the web interface, not 
simply cut/pasted into the ticket comment.  I took what you pasted in and ran it through 2.64, and 
was not able to reproduce the issue with multiple Subject headers occuring during the rewrite.

At this point, BTW, the 2.6 series is no longer supported.  Please consider upgrading to a 3.0 series 
release.
Comment 2 Alexander Hochhalter 2004-10-11 06:45:33 UTC 
Subject: Re:  Double Subject

hi,
the same with V-3.0.0  (You should see attachment)

alex


At 05:46 11.10.2004 -0700, you wrote:
>http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3892
>
>felicity@kluge.net changed:
>
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
>          Resolution|                            |WORKSFORME
>
>
>
>------- Additional Comments From felicity@kluge.net  2004-10-11 05:46 -------
>Hi,
>
>As per the notice when you opened the ticket, messages should be attached 
>via the web interface, not
>simply cut/pasted into the ticket comment.  I took what you pasted in and 
>ran it through 2.64, and
>was not able to reproduce the issue with multiple Subject headers occuring 
>during the rewrite.
>
>At this point, BTW, the 2.6 series is no longer supported.  Please 
>consider upgrading to a 3.0 series
>release.
>
>
>
>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
>You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
Comment 3 Theo Van Dinter 2004-10-11 07:26:44 UTC 
Subject: Re:  Double Subject

On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 06:45:34AM -0700, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.spamassassin.org wrote:
> the same with V-3.0.0  (You should see attachment)

There was no attachment, which was my first issue.

I can't reproduce the issue with the 3.0 code either, btw.
Comment 4 Sidney Markowitz 2004-10-11 11:15:46 UTC 
If you really can make this happen in 3.0, then 1) Attach the original message
before it was sent through SpamAssassin, not the wrong results; Also either
attach the wrong results, or paste the headers that show the error into a
comment 2) Attach it using the Bugzilla web interface, not as an attachment to
email you send here, which will do nothing useful; 3) Include a comment showing
what non-default options you have in your prefernces such as report_header and
report_safe, as well as how you are running spamassassin with the command line
options you are using in spamassassin or spamd.

Remember this should be using 3.0 as 2.6x is no longer being supported.

The idea give us a chance to reproduce the results you are seeing as well as
some way to tell if it is a bug or a configuration error on your part.

If you can do all three items I listed above, you can reopen the bug. All three.
Otherwise it will stay marked as resolved.