Bug 4995 - learning of spam by spamassassin doesn't seem working well
Summary: learning of spam by spamassassin doesn't seem working well
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Spamassassin
Classification: Unclassified
Component: spamc/spamd (show other bugs)
Version: 3.1.3
Hardware: All Linux
: P5 normal
Target Milestone: Undefined
Assignee: SpamAssassin Developer Mailing List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-07-18 07:55 UTC by Ashok Jani
Modified: 2006-07-18 07:55 UTC (History)
0 users



Attachment Type Modified Status Actions Submitter/CLA Status

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ashok Jani 2006-07-18 07:55:17 UTC
Dear Dev,

I have configured spamassassin version 3.1.3 on SuSE linux in order to take 
care of small site wide e-mail server. As suggested I have configured a mail 
account named spamtrap to train the spamassassin for the spam mails. It seems 
that the working of this account and the training of spammassassin 
through .procmailrc configuration, particularly /usr/bin/spamassassin -r -d is 
working fine. because the proclog generated shows all fine execution. 

But when I sent the same mail which is earlier trained as spam to the 
spamassassin to other account on the same server the spamassassin doen't 
identify the mail as spam which is unexpected. 

It declares many other well known spam mails as spam if I send those mail to 
the same mail account. So the engine and other mechanisms are working well on 
the server. 

How do I come to know that the spamassassin is being trained in right way?
Why spamassassin is not declaring the mail as spam which is earlier trained as 
spam?
Comment 1 Theo Van Dinter 2006-07-18 14:55:59 UTC
Hi,

For questions about using SpamAssassin, please post to the
users@spamassassin.apache.org list.  Bugzilla is meant for discussing and
tracking bug and enhancement issues.  If through the discussion on the users
list it's found that there's a bug, then please feel free to open a ticket about
that.

Thanks.