Those rules are promoted based on evidence in corpora.  Additionally, many of the newer TLDs do not have appropriate fraud protection.

If you have a FP with the domain, add a sample to pastebin for consideration.  The hits you are listing below show a system not running sa-update for rule updates.

Additionally, the rules you are listing are not up to date PDS_PRO_TLD was created specifically to check the S/O of the rule independently of other domains.

One customer send me this diagnostic info:
Szczegó³y analizy zawarto¶ci: (8.0 zaliczonych, 5.5 wymaganych)

pkt  nazwa regu³y           krótki opis
---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------
 3.5 BAYES_99               BODY: Bayesowskie prawdopodobieñstwo spamu wynosi 99 do
                             100%
                            [score: 0.9986]
-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
                            [URI: webstars.pro (pro)]
 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level
                            mail domains are different
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: Wiadomo¶æ zawiera kod HTML
-0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                            author's domain
 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                            valid
 1.8 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP From abused NTLD
 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD

4.3 points just for a PRO domain does seem just a bit excessive.
Of course the bayes_99 score didn't help, but I find it hard to believe that any domain name in itself is worth more than maybe 2 points.

It would be better to get rid of that:
2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD
1.8 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP 
0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD

I don't send any spam, any email marketing campaings.
My server use DKIM.

But almost all my emails go to Spam and my recipient don't see them.

One server admin told me that if SpamAssassing change its rules to not treat PRO domain as Untrustworthy TLDs or SUSPICIOUS_NTLD it will be better.
That's why I'm posting here.

I can not normally run my bussiness because of that.

Help.

You have already been told that the rules are not current.

Only thing that will currently hit is:

1.0 PDS_PRO_TLD

Redirect your queries to the clueless server admins who run out-of-date SpamAssassin versions/rules.

(In reply to Henrik Krohns from comment #5)
> You have already been told that the rules are not current.
> 
> Only thing that will currently hit is:
> 
> 1.0 PDS_PRO_TLD
> 
> Redirect your queries to the clueless server admins who run out-of-date
> SpamAssassin versions/rules.

It was a bit of sarcasm?
:-)

Who can change this?
2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD
1.8 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP 
0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD

in order not to treat PRO domains as SPAM

?
Is here any person who can process it,  reprogramm SpamAssassin rules?
Or something like that?

As mentioned before, the rules are fixed. Whatever system is hitting those rules, is poorly maintained and not running rule updates.

Contact the administrators of that server and stop reopening this ticket.

This ticket has not been solved.
I can NOT contact with all server administrators around the world if I want to send email.
It is ridiculous idea.

Each rules can be changed.

COM domain should be completely blocked.

Spam Assassing rules block PRO domain as untrusted.
It not truth.
It should be changed. I can't run my business.

Are you going to help or only close the ticket to have more free time?

(In reply to WebStars from comment #9)
> This ticket has not been solved.
> I can NOT contact with all server administrators around the world

And neither can the SpamAssassin project.

(In reply to WebStars from comment #9)
> Spam Assassing rules block PRO domain as untrusted.

The currently published rules *do not* do so.

> It should be changed.

It *has been* changed.

> Are you going to help or only close the ticket to have more free time?

The SpamAssassin project has done all it can to address this problem. The currently published rules only score *one* point for mailing from or mentioning the .pro domain.

SA is not centrally controlled. The SA project *publishes* rules for sites to download and install, it does not *push* them onto all existing SA installs. We have no control over sites that are using stale rules. We cannot force them to update their rules.

SpamAssassin installations do not register, so the SA project has no way to know where SA is being used, or what portion of those installs are stale or misconfigured. We have no way to contact them unless they voluntarily subscribe to the SA Users mailing list.

We're not simply ignoring you, or the problem. We've done all we can to fix it.

If a customer of yours sees a message from you being scored like that, then they (or you) need to contact *their* ISP and tell them their SpamAssassin install is stale and is rejecting messages it should not. I'm sorry that that is the best we can do, but it is, and ranting about it won't change that situation.

Thank you for the long answer.
Now I understand what's going on.
Thanks.

(In reply to WebStars from comment #12)
> Thank you for the long answer.
> Now I understand what's going on.
> Thanks.

You're welcome.