Bug 817 - What happened to the header existence tests?
Summary: What happened to the header existence tests?
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Spamassassin
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Rules (show other bugs)
Version: 2.41CVS
Hardware: Other other
: P4 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: SpamAssassin Developer Mailing List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-09-03 20:48 UTC by Daniel Quinlan
Modified: 2002-12-23 12:58 UTC (History)
0 users


Attachment Type Modified Status Actions Submitter/CLA Status
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Daniel Quinlan 2002-09-03 20:48:24 UTC 
How are X-EM-Registration, X-EM-Version, X-Antiabuse, X-List-Host,
and X-Message-Id "not spammish"?

Justin, it's your name on those lines... :-)
Comment 1 Justin Mason 2002-09-04 06:28:17 UTC 
X-EM-* is from the EarthLink MailBox mailer. it always seems to appear in
conjunction with:

X-EM-Version: 5, 0, 0, 0
X-EM-Registration: #3003520714B31D032830
X-Mailer: EarthLink MailBox 5.0.7.9 (Windows)

and not often so in spam, so that may be revivable as a good meta test.

X-Antiabuse is added by wizardshosting.com, zeus.jtlnet.com, and others
(all Exim sites it seems, hosting, doing POP-before-SMTP relaying).
I get quite a few nonspam hits for it and
zero spam hits.  Again, unless we can make them good meta tests, I'd
leave it commented.

X-List-Host and X-Message-Id are both Lyris artifacts.  Any host that uses Lyris
software to host its list will produce this, including Lockergnome and the IETF
WG lists at Certicom.
Comment 2 Justin Mason 2002-10-25 10:24:29 UTC 
downgrading bug
Comment 3 Theo Van Dinter 2002-12-23 21:58:04 UTC 
These aren't in 2.50, so I'm assuming the issue has been taken care of.
Comment 4 Daniel Quinlan 2002-12-23 23:37:55 UTC 
Subject: Re:  What happened to the header existence tests?

> These aren't in 2.50, so I'm assuming the issue has been taken care of.

The issue was that some of the good ones had been removed.  It would be
worth re-spinning any deleted ones 70_cvs_rules_under_test.cf, I think.