Bug 848 - Default white lists should be eliminated.
Summary: Default white lists should be eliminated.
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 846
Alias: None
Product: Spamassassin
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Rules (show other bugs)
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Hardware: Other other
: P1 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: SpamAssassin Developer Mailing List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-09-07 08:57 UTC by Marc Perkel
Modified: 2002-09-19 17:33 UTC (History)
0 users


Attachment Type Modified Status Actions Submitter/CLA Status
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Marc Perkel 2002-09-07 08:57:53 UTC 
Another spammer taking advantage of default white lists.

Envelope-to: barlow@eff.org
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 20:12:48 -0800
CC: barlow@eff.org
From: penolope@law.com
Subject: what secrets about who does the internet hold
Reply-To: danapoint@mypersonalemail.com
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-68.0 required=5.0
    tests=BIG_FONT,CALL_FREE,CLICK_BELOW,CTYPE_JUST_HTML,
          FIND_ANYTHING,HIDDEN_ASSETS,HTML_50_70,
          HTML_FONT_COLOR_BLUE,HTML_FONT_COLOR_GRAY,
          HTML_FONT_COLOR_NAME,HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED,
          HTML_FONT_COLOR_UNSAFE,MAILTO_LINK,MISSING_HEADERS,
          NO_REAL_NAME,OPT_IN,RAZOR2_CHECK,RAZOR_CHECK,
          RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM,REMOVAL_INSTRUCTIONS,
          SOCIAL_SEC_NUMBER,SPAM_PHRASE_21_34,TABLE_THICK_BORDER,
          USER_IN_WHITELIST,X_OSIRU_SPAM_SRC
    version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level:
Status:
Comment 1 Michael Moncur 2002-09-07 09:03:35 UTC 
How does the whitelist fit into this? law.com and mypersonalemail.com aren't on 
it. Was there another address that isn't included in the headers you posted?

Also, this is probably a duplicate of bug #846.
Comment 2 Daniel Quinlan 2002-09-20 01:33:32 UTC 
duplicate


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 846 ***