Bug 49530

Summary: Context is not correctly stopped at shutdown
Product: Tomcat 7 Reporter: Rainer Frey <rainer.frey+tomcat>
Component: CatalinaAssignee: Tomcat Developers Mailing List <dev>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: normal CC: nehme-haddad
Priority: P2    
Version: 7.0.0   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: PC   
OS: Linux   
Attachments: Application that show the behavior
Source code of the test servlet
Log file with LifecycleBase logger on FINE level

Description Rainer Frey 2010-06-30 10:08:43 UTC
Created attachment 25669 [details]
Application that show the behavior

Apparently a web application context is not correctly stopped when shutting down Tomcat 7.0.0. I noticed that the destroy() method of a Servlet that's loaded on startup was not called, and put together a test case (see attached files). 

The test servlet writes to System.out on init() and destroy(), the output on init appears in logs/catalina.out, but no output on destroy. From what I  understand of the attached log, the context isn't stopped at all.

Steps to reproduce:
1. copy attached startupServlet.war to webapps
2. start Tomcat, then "StartTestServlet.init" appears in catalina.out
3. stop Tomcat

Actual Result:
no output appears in logs/catalina.out

Expected Result:
"StartTestServlet.destroy" appears in catalina.out
catalina.log shows evidence of context /startupServlet being stopped


FWIW:
java -version:
java version "1.6.0_20"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_20-b02)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 16.3-b01, mixed mode)

uname -a
Linux <hostname> 2.6.32-22-generic #36-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 3 19:31:57 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Comment 1 Rainer Frey 2010-06-30 10:10:24 UTC
Created attachment 25670 [details]
Source code of the test servlet
Comment 2 Rainer Frey 2010-06-30 10:12:25 UTC
Created attachment 25671 [details]
Log file with LifecycleBase logger on FINE level
Comment 3 Mark Thomas 2010-07-02 14:05:51 UTC
Thanks for the report and test case.

This has been fixed in trunk and will be included in 7.0.1 onwards.
Comment 4 Mark Thomas 2010-08-30 08:38:19 UTC
*** Bug 49846 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***