|Summary:||Change artifact names of poi-/ooxml-schemas|
|Product:||POI||Reporter:||Andreas Beeker <kiwiwings>|
|Component:||POI Overall||Assignee:||POI Developers List <dev>|
Description Andreas Beeker 2020-12-13 15:29:08 UTC
As proposed in , I've changed the artifact names. poi-ooxml-schemas -> poi-ooxml-lite ooxml-schemas -> poi-ooxml-full I've debated with myself, if poi-schemas-lite/full would be less confusing as we already have a mandatory poi-ooxml (base) artifact, but I like the term ooxml better so I stick with the above ... Furthermore I'll release the schemas with every release - so no confusing mapping between ooxml schema versions and poi versions anymore.  http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/Update-to-ECMA-376-3rd-edition-provide-ooxml-schema-with-every-release-tp5736431.html
Comment 2 PJ Fanning 2020-12-13 17:44:54 UTC
Possibly, a bit late but I wonder if we should put the word transitional in the jar name(s) because we are working with the transitional xsd instead of the strict xsd.
Comment 3 Andreas Beeker 2020-12-13 17:58:14 UTC
(In reply to PJ Fanning from comment #2) > Possibly, a bit late but I wonder if we should put the word transitional in > the jar name(s) because we are working with the transitional xsd instead of > the strict xsd. Even if there's an issue #57699, I think this transition "never" ends and we won't support the strict schema in the near future and transitional sounds like temporary to me - "here we have some fresh schemas for you, but take them as they are hot" ;) I thought keeping the artifacts names short is also beneficial.