Hi *, have you ever considered the GNU trove library as replacement for the standard collections? It's memory allocation is better and you do make extensive use of collections. Yours, Andreas
*** Bug 22459 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
You have a sick sense of humor my friend or You managed to NOT read the press.... The following articles were primarily bound in my desire to use GNU Trove: http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=10574 http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=10550 http://developers.slashdot.org/developers/03/07/17/ 2257224.shtml?tid=108&tid=117&tid=126&tid=156&tid=99 http://linuxintegrators.com/archive/hl30/technology/?permalink=LGPL+in+Java.html http://linuxintegrators.com/archive/hl30/technology/ ?permalink=what+to+do+about+the+LGPL+in+Java+.html In the end we discovered LGPL is okay for situations where you can avoid distributing the LGPL library and still have the software work. There aren't really any such situations in POI. The issue is with section 6 of the LGPL. Unless the Trove developers would give us special dispensation to release trove sans section 6, we're pretty much stuck.
Sorry, failed to read the press...