Hi! my conf: -------- AddHandler application/x-httpd-eperl .phtml Action application/x-httpd-eperl /cgi-bin/nph-test my request: ----------- telnet myhost 80 GET /test/t1.phtml HTTP 1.1 Host: myhost apache send me: --------------- HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Type: text/plain Hello! HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 21:27:38 GMT Server: Apache/2.0.47 (Debian GNU/Linux) mod_perl/1.99_09 Perl/v5.8.0 mod_ssl/2.0.47 OpenSSL/0.9.7b Content-Length: 0 Connection: close Content-Type: application/x-httpd-php my script nph-test: ------------------- #!/usr/bin/perl print "HTTP/1.1 200 OK\n"; print "Content-Type: text/plain\n\n"; print "Hello!\n"; where is bug? ------------- My script noprint seccond HTTP header. Why apache generate second header? Bye Marek
Hmm. e-perl is mod_perl, isn't it? I'd guess, mod_perl doesn't support nph-scripts at all, you'd have to use mod_cgi instead.
mod_perl no problem. I tested my example without loading mod_perl module too. Problem is mod_cgi and mod_cgid. My example don't use e-perl.
I am getting this problem too, with Meta-HTML. I have not been able to reproduce by telnetting to port, b/c the second header seems to be sent after the connection is closed! but all my pages are served with a second header at the end. For example, http://www.metasystema.net/welcome.mhtml telnet shows the Meta-HTML headers at the beginning where one would expect them: get /welcome.mhtml HTTP/1.0 200 OK Server: MHttpd/4.1 (bfox; i686-linux; Meta-HTML/6.11) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 23:08:24 GMT Expires: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 23:08:24 GMT Last-modified: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 23:07:24 GMT Content-length: 9585 Meta-HTML-Engine: MHttpd/4.1 (bfox; i686-linux; Meta-HTML/6.11) Content-type: text/html then at the end, the page displays the apache2 header (from view source): HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 23:05:58 GMT Server: Apache/2.0.48 (Gentoo/Linux) Content-Length: 0 Keep-Alive: timeout=15, max=100 Connection: Keep-Alive Content-Type: metahtml/interpreted My conf: -------- AddType metahtml/interpreted .mhtml Action metahtml/interpreted /cgi-bin/nph-engine ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ /www/metasystema.net/cgi-bin/ I've verified this occurs in 2.0.48 as well as 2.0.47.
sounds really like a nasty bug ;-)
*** Bug 26724 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
I have a similar problem, using an "nph-" script via mod_cgi, being redirected via mod_rewrite. If I call the script directly, I do not get the additonal header at the end, but if I go through mod_rewrite, I do. This is with Apache 2.0.54 and 2.0.55.
This bug persists on Apache 2.2.It is caused in generators/mod_cgi.c, line 760 nph = !(strncmp(argv0, "nph-", 4)); Add the following just before it (recompile, start with debug logging on): ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_DEBUG, 0, r, "Identifying cgi script:%s", r->filename); We can see that the strncmp will fail, because the cgi script will include a full path: e.g. "Identifying cgi script:/home/www/site/test/bin/nph-foobar.cgi" The conf lines for this are as follows: ScriptAlias /x/ /home/www/site/test/bin Action foo-file /x/nph-foobar.cgi AddHandler foo-file .foo So - changing line 760 to: nph = ( strstr(argv0,"nph-") != NULL ); (which of course means that any "nph-" will return positive...) now identifies nph scripts as such. However.. the additional headers STILL appear... at which point.. I am stumped.
There is a work-around, which is to change the return line of any cgi script from being e.g. HTTP/1.1 200 OK to Status 200 OK - and dropping nph- status. Of course this does NOT fix the legacy issue, and probably remains a typical reason why so many people carry on using 1.3.x (slaps wrist). I've done some more RA on this. The dupe header always shows Content-Length: 0 It looks like a default / stub header is being pushed out. Interestingly - this bug ONLY appears to occur when using the Action directive, (It makes no difference if one uses AddType or AddHandler or SetHandler ) .. guess where I will look next... Output filters are being correctly stripped by mod-cgi - though it seems like it would be easier just to do something like rv = ap_pass_brigade(r->output_filters, bb); .. but hey, what do I know?
Created attachment 17796 [details] This is a drop in replacement that fixes bug 22898 This adds some APLOG_DEBUG messages, which are useful for nph- bug issues. There are 2 major bugs that are now 'fixed' here. Of course, the fixes are kludges, but then I'm not a core Apache programmer. Note that identification of nph- now uses strstr, rather than strncmp! Also note that the nph- code part strips out output_filters from it's immediate caller!
This bug is essentially fixed - though it needs to be folded into the main cvs. There were two basic bugs here - one was the faulty (ie not working) identification of nph- cgi scripts. The other was the misconception that an nph-cgi request will be the initial request; something patently not true when being called via Action. The fix that I have done is lame. It only deals with one previous process; however, this seems to be the primary problem, so it works. Basically, we now call ap_is_initial_req(r) and if it is !=1, then we also strip the output_filters of the previous/container request. I have posted the entire amended file. sorry. I don't understand the patch system..
Created attachment 17891 [details] mod_cgi diff file that fixes 22898 and related bugs The Apache2.x fails to behave properly when nph- are used in Actions. This patch includes some debugging messages, and fixes two related severe bugs which cause nph- cgi scripts to fail when cgi,_handler is called via an Action directive. The bugs are (1) apr_filepath_name_get(r->filename) returns a full path when cgi_handler is accessed via Action, which means that the strncmp test fails to identify the nph- prefix. (2) The clear up of the bucket brigade fails unless the request is the ap_is_initial_req. The fix in the patch for (1) is to use strstr instead of strncmp - though there may be a better fix for that. The fix in the patch for (2) is on false for ap_is_initial_req to clear the bucket brigade at r->prev.
After a year, the patch below has still not been folded into the 2.2 trunk. Until it is, nph- scripts addressed via AddHandler or Action fail on Apache 2.x! I am aware that nph- is considered a dead area - but it's necessary for legacy code and regardless, Apache 2.x claims support for it (and indeed does support it when it is not referred to via Action or AddHandler)