Bug 26368 - File extensions in AddDescription treated as part of filename (not extension)
Summary: File extensions in AddDescription treated as part of filename (not extension)
Status: RESOLVED LATER
Alias: None
Product: Apache httpd-2
Classification: Unclassified
Component: mod_autoindex (show other bugs)
Version: 2.0.48
Hardware: PC All
: P3 minor with 1 vote (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Apache HTTPD Bugs Mailing List
URL:
Keywords: MassUpdate
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-01-23 01:52 UTC by Juanma Barranquero
Modified: 2018-11-07 21:08 UTC (History)
0 users



Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Juanma Barranquero 2004-01-23 01:52:30 UTC
With:

  AddIcon /icons/c.gif .c
  AddDescription "C source" .c

in httpd.conf, and files:

  test1.c
  test2.chm

in an autoindexed dir,

  test1.c (correctly) appears with the .C icon and "C source" as description.
  test2.chm shows the "?" icon (that's correct), but also "C source". ??

AddDescription help says: "File is a file extension, partial filename, wild-
card expression or full filename for files to describe." Help for AddIcon 
says: "Name is either ^^DIRECTORY^^ for directories, ^^BLANKICON^^ for blank 
lines (to format the list correctly), a file extension, a wildcard expression, 
a partial filename or a complete filename".

So, except by the ^^DIRECTORY^^/^^BLANKICON^^ part, they should have the same 
behavior with respect to file extensions...
Comment 1 William A. Rowe Jr. 2018-11-07 21:08:21 UTC
Please help us to refine our list of open and current defects; this is a mass update of old and inactive Bugzilla reports which reflect user error, already resolved defects, and still-existing defects in httpd.

As repeatedly announced, the Apache HTTP Server Project has discontinued all development and patch review of the 2.2.x series of releases. The final release 2.2.34 was published in July 2017, and no further evaluation of bug reports or security risks will be considered or published for 2.2.x releases. All reports older than 2.4.x have been updated to status RESOLVED/LATER; no further action is expected unless the report still applies to a current version of httpd.

If your report represented a question or confusion about how to use an httpd feature, an unexpected server behavior, problems building or installing httpd, or working with an external component (a third party module, browser etc.) we ask you to start by bringing your question to the User Support and Discussion mailing list, see [https://httpd.apache.org/lists.html#http-users] for details. Include a link to this Bugzilla report for completeness with your question.

If your report was clearly a defect in httpd or a feature request, we ask that you retest using a modern httpd release (2.4.33 or later) released in the past year. If it can be reproduced, please reopen this bug and change the Version field above to the httpd version you have reconfirmed with.

Your help in identifying defects or enhancements still applicable to the current httpd server software release is greatly appreciated.