The company tag implements a stock grammar RDC which can be used to recognize the name or stock symbol of a company listed in a stock exchange. It can be used in VoiceXML applications that require users to input a company about whose information they are interested in. An example would be an application that provides stock quotes. A stock quotes application can use the stock grammar RDC to identify the company for which the user is interested in getting the stock quote. New Files: /jakarta-taglibs-sandbox/rdc/src/org/apache/taglibs/rdc/Company.java /jakarta-taglibs-sandbox/rdc/src/META-INF/tags/rdc/company.rdc /jakarta-taglibs-sandbox/rdc/src/META-INF/tags/rdc/company.tag /jakarta-taglibs-sandbox/rdc/src/META-INF/tags/rdc/config/company.xml /jakarta-taglibs-sandbox/rdc/src/.grammar/company_DTMF.grxml /jakarta-taglibs-sandbox/rdc/src/.grammar/company_voice.grxml /jakarta-taglibs-sandbox/rdc/examples/web/stockQuotes.jsp /jakarta-taglibs-sandbox/rdc/examples/web/companyRDC.readme Modified Files: /jakarta-taglibs-sandbox/rdc/xml/rdc.xml
Created attachment 15674 [details] company tag implementation files
Hi, though you have a nice idea for a component, I cannot accept this submission because of the Copyright line in each file. If you are willing to change that (look at any other file in the RDC distribution for what the "norm" is), I'd be happy to reconsider. You will need to re-attach a patch if you choose to make the changes.
Created attachment 16010 [details] Updated copyright line Copyright line is updated to remove the web address.
(In reply to comment #2) We reviewed the copyright line and removed the web address present after the company name. Now the copyright line is in accordance with the boilerplate notice specified in http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html#apply. New set of sources with this correction has been submitted. > Hi, though you have a nice idea for a component, I cannot accept this > submission because of the Copyright line in each file. If you are willing to > change that (look at any other file in the RDC distribution for what > the "norm" is), I'd be happy to reconsider. You will need to re-attach a patch > if you choose to make the changes.
Thanks for taking time to make the changes, but that link talks about applying the license to your work (which you may then distribute independently using other avenues). For code that you've written specifically with the intention of contributing to an existing Apache project, it is best to make sure the license header identical to the rest of the files in that project. (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > We reviewed the copyright line and removed the web address present after > the company name. Now the copyright line is in accordance with the > boilerplate notice specified in > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html#apply. > New set of sources with this correction has been submitted. > > Hi, though you have a nice idea for a component, I cannot accept this > > submission because of the Copyright line in each file. If you are willing to > > change that (look at any other file in the RDC distribution for what > > the "norm" is), I'd be happy to reconsider. You will need to re-attach a > patch > > if you choose to make the changes.