This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
Summary: | Missing action Indent XML. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | xml | Reporter: | issues@www <issues> |
Component: | Text-Edit | Assignee: | _ pkuzel <pkuzel> |
Status: | VERIFIED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | blocker | ||
Priority: | P3 | ||
Version: | 3.x | ||
Hardware: | PC | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Issue Type: | ENHANCEMENT | Exception Reporter: |
Description
issues@www
2001-09-21 10:41:12 UTC
Target milestone -> 3.3.1. Target milestone -> 3.3.1. Classified as enhancement. *** Issue 19825 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** a really nice example of a code beautifier is found in htmlkit available at chami.com at bare minimum something like this kind of clean output would be nice for the xml indentation <app:editor class="org.jbrix.gui.app.XPad" id="wizard" window.title="%f - wizard"> <form ref="."> <components> <textfield ref="."> <caption>Wizard Subject</caption> <help>Give your wizard subject a meaningful name.</help> </textfield> <textfield ref="wizdescription"> <caption>wizard description</caption> </textfield> <textfield ref="wizauthor"> <caption>wizard author</caption> <default>Dennis Daniels</default> </textfield> <textfield ref="wizardsource"> <caption>wizard source file</caption> <help>This is where the users will be able to access the source of the wizard. Use the force, read the source.</help> </textfield> Let these are considered while planning next release. Target milestone was changed from not determined to TBD Lowering to P3 in favour of completion support. *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 22510 *** isn't it strange marking this issue as duplicate of issue #22510 which is subtask of this issue? Please, see addd.comment in issue #22510 >------- Additional Comments From Petr Kuzel 2002-08-13 13:52 PDT >------- >Such feature was removed, because it requires >hints from user to work properly. We have not >yet agreed what minimal set of hints is >needed. > >Subtask of issue 15749. |