This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 15805

Summary: Explorer trees not sorted correctly - uppercase before lowercase
Product: platform Reporter: Jose Barrera <barrera>
Component: ExplorerAssignee: t_h <t_h>
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX    
Severity: blocker CC: jrechtacek, jrojcek
Priority: P3 Keywords: UI
Version: 3.x   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT Exception Reporter:

Description Jose Barrera 2001-09-21 16:28:47 UTC
In the explorer, all trees are not ordered alphabetically but uppercase first 
and lowercase later. This is very annoying.
Comment 1 jcatchpoole 2001-09-24 16:32:40 UTC
Recategorizing Component to core - this is not a www issue.
Core guys, I hope this is the right place.
Comment 2 Lukas Hasik 2001-10-31 13:32:38 UTC
assigning to David
Comment 3 David Strupl 2002-01-04 13:33:40 UTC
This seems like a request for enhancement. I am changing issue type
and target milestone. It would require adding a new sorting mode to
DataFolder.SortMode and changing FolderOrder.

Current state is not a defect IMHO.
Comment 4 David Simonek 2002-02-05 14:37:17 UTC
UI team, please comment, but this is very minor IMO, current state is
fine for me. So I'm deferring to 4.0.
Comment 5 Jiri Rechtacek 2002-07-23 14:16:14 UTC
Jano, could you comment it? Is this enhancement useful and consistent?
Thanks
Comment 6 Jiri Rechtacek 2002-07-29 16:19:14 UTC
Jano, could you comment it? Is this enhancement useful and consistent?
After evaluation reassign back.
Thanks
Comment 7 _ tboudreau 2004-08-16 08:23:56 UTC
*** Issue 34185 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 8 Antonin Nebuzelsky 2008-02-07 16:15:01 UTC
Reassigning to new module owner Tomas Holy.
Comment 9 t_h 2008-10-20 09:47:45 UTC
The order of nodes is defined by nodes provider. Please report against the module providing misbehaving nodes.
Comment 10 t_h 2008-10-22 09:45:57 UTC
*** Issue 65945 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***