This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 177098

Summary: Function name that is treated as keyword in JavaFX is not properly formatted
Product: javafx Reporter: Alexandr Scherbatiy <sunflower>
Component: EditorAssignee: Anton Chechel <manowar>
Severity: normal CC: sustaining
Priority: P3    
Version: 6.x   
Hardware: PC   
OS: Windows XP   
Issue Type: DEFECT Exception Reporter:
Bug Depends on:    
Bug Blocks: 173487    

Description Alexandr Scherbatiy 2009-11-18 08:04:09 UTC
Product Version         = NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 200911171401) (#d7b3ad6247f5)
  Operating System        = Windows XP version 5.1 running on x86
  Java; VM; Vendor        = 1.6.0_15; Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 14.1-b02; Sun
Microsystems Inc.

Steps to reproduce:
- Format the code
function r(str:String) {
    str.replace(" ", "&nbsp;");

The result is:
function r(str: String) {
replace(" ", "&nbsp;");
Comment 1 Anton Chechel 2009-11-26 07:06:40 UTC

By the way this is very interesting bug. Unlike Java in JavaFX there are non-reserved keywords like "replace" which can be identifiers as well.

Please create issue for semantic highlighting: all non-reserved keywords which are identifiers incorrectly highlighted.

// ---------------------
// Non-reserved keywords
// Some tokens are returned by the lexer as keywords for the grammar
// but are not reserved words in the language. These can be used as
// identifiers and are basically the set of keywords that cannot
// possibly start a statement/expression, such as 'to' but not those
// that are not sensible to allow as identifiers, such as 'true'.
    : FIRST     | IN    | INIT      | INTO
    | INVERSE   | LAST  | ON        | POSTINIT      
Comment 2 Alexandr Scherbatiy 2009-11-27 03:12:54 UTC
Created issue 177721  Function name that is treated as keyword in JavaFX is not properly highlighted
Comment 3 Alexandr Scherbatiy 2009-12-11 04:58:10 UTC
verified in NetBeans-JavaFX-Soma:  #62
Comment 4 Petr Suchomel 2010-01-15 03:32:57 UTC
Fixed in release68_fixes
Comment 5 Alexandr Scherbatiy 2010-01-26 02:53:41 UTC
Verified in NB 6.8 patch1 2010-01-25_21-27-59