This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 145686 - Web Project context menu is very slow making it effectively unusable
Summary: Web Project context menu is very slow making it effectively unusable
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 145464
Alias: None
Product: javaee
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Code (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P1 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@javaee
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-08-30 16:33 UTC by Chris Webster
Modified: 2008-09-01 09:53 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
stack trace during slow performance (15.16 KB, text/plain)
2008-08-31 17:50 UTC, Chris Webster 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Chris Webster 2008-08-30 16:33:59 UTC 
I am running NetBeans 6.5 Beta (Java SE 1.6.0_07) and when the context menu for the web project (right click on the web
project) is enabled (to deploy for example). ON a dual core 2 GHZ laptop, it took so long I thought it was a deadlock.
It seems to be beyond the context menu however as selecting the project node causes the same behavior, very sluggish
response. 

Even after disabling many of the modules likely participating in the web project (JSF ...), the menu is still slow
although not as slow as with all the modules turned on.
Comment 1 Vince Kraemer 2008-08-31 17:27:25 UTC 
could you generate a thread dump and attach it to this issue?
Comment 2 Chris Webster 2008-08-31 17:50:54 UTC 
Created attachment 68732 [details]
stack trace during slow performance
Comment 3 Chris Webster 2008-08-31 17:52:48 UTC 
This was after disabling some of the modules and with a large web project and 15 java projects packaged in the web
module. This is much slower than 6.1.
Comment 4 Petr Jiricka 2008-09-01 09:53:21 UTC 
I believe this is a duplicate of issue 145464.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 145464 ***