This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 197415 - [70cat]Code folding incorrectly refreshed
Summary: [70cat]Code folding incorrectly refreshed
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 196281
Alias: None
Product: editor
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Code folding (show other bugs)
Version: 7.0
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Assignee: Miloslav Metelka
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-04-05 01:13 UTC by alied
Modified: 2011-04-13 09:01 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Code folding incorrectly refreshed (112.00 KB, image/png)
2011-04-05 01:15 UTC, alied 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description alied 2011-04-05 01:13:43 UTC 
When collapsing a function, inner class, or another, the folding indicators below the collapsed refresh incorrectly.
However, if scrolled up or down, so the code piece goes off view, the folding indicators appear fine.
After some hours, newly added items (function, inner class, etc) do not show folding indicator.
later I'll try with -J-Dsun.java2d.noddraw=false
Product Version = NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 201104010400)
Operating System = Windows XP version 5.1 running on x86
Java; VM; Vendor = 1.6.0_24
Runtime = Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 19.1-b02
netbeans_default_options="-J-client -J-Xss2m -J-Xms64m -J-Xmx256m -J-XX:PermSize=32m -J-XX:MaxPermSize=384m -J-Dnetbeans.logger.console=true -J-ea -J-Dapple.laf.useScreenMenuBar=true -J-Dapple.awt.graphics.UseQuartz=true -J-Dsun.java2d.noddraw=true"
Comment 1 alied 2011-04-05 01:15:12 UTC 
with J-Dsun.java2d.noddraw=false happens as well
Comment 2 alied 2011-04-05 01:15:24 UTC 
Created attachment 107493 [details]
Code folding incorrectly refreshed
Comment 3 maghiel 2011-04-13 01:42:00 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 196651 ***
Comment 4 Marian Mirilovic 2011-04-13 09:01:19 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 196281 ***