This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 241737 - Value for watch does not display desired input
Summary: Value for watch does not display desired input
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: debugger
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Java (show other bugs)
Version: 8.0
Hardware: PC Windows 7
: P3 normal (vote)
Assignee: Martin Entlicher
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-02-12 07:10 UTC by stwr
Modified: 2015-08-20 06:10 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description stwr 2014-02-12 07:10:15 UTC
Test Specification - Debugger Part III - Debugging Views
Test Suite - Watches view
Test Case - Evaluation II

The value field contains 'Malformed expression: "(ERROR)"' instead of expected text.
Comment 1 stwr 2014-02-12 07:10:57 UTC
Test Specification - Debugger Part III - Debugging Views
Test Suite - Watches view
Test Case - Evaluation III

The value field contains 'Malformed expression: "(ERROR)"' instead of expected text.
Comment 2 Martin Entlicher 2014-02-14 14:37:12 UTC
It looks like this is a description printed before we changed the evaluator (issue #108873).
But it has a sense to display a more detailed message. I'll have a look if I can get some error description from the javac parser.
Comment 3 stwr 2015-08-12 07:12:06 UTC
Still reproducible.

Product Version: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 201508100002)
Java: 1.8.0_60-ea; Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 25.60-b23
Runtime: Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment 1.8.0_60-ea-b25
System: Windows 7 version 6.1 running on amd64; Cp1250; en_US (nb)
User directory: C:\Users\cendrowiczm\AppData\Roaming\NetBeans\dev
Cache directory: C:\Users\cendrowiczm\AppData\Local\NetBeans\Cache\dev
Comment 4 Martin Entlicher 2015-08-13 12:05:30 UTC
The Version field should not be updated - it should contain the oldest version it was found in.
Comment 5 -Silver- 2015-08-16 17:01:49 UTC
IMHO it should be marked more as ENHANCEMENT than as DEFECT.
Comment 6 Martin Entlicher 2015-08-20 06:10:12 UTC
I agree. Thanks.