This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 252324 - OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded
Summary: OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: updatecenters
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Pluginportal (show other bugs)
Version: 8.0
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Assignee: sreimers
: 254130 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Reported: 2015-05-09 21:13 UTC by A13XIS
Modified: 2015-08-04 15:06 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 217209

stacktrace (2.74 KB, text/plain)
2015-05-09 21:13 UTC, A13XIS

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description A13XIS 2015-05-09 21:13:49 UTC
Build: NetBeans IDE 8.0.2 (Build 201411181905)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM, 25.31-b07, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.8.0_31-b13
OS: Windows 7

User Comments:
A13XIS: No reaction after using Netbeans with Monet (JavaFX scene builder integration)

java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded
   at java.lang.SecurityManager.checkPackageAccess(
   at sun.reflect.misc.ReflectUtil.checkPackageAccess(
   at sun.reflect.misc.ReflectUtil.checkPackageAccess(
   at sun.reflect.misc.ConstructorUtil.getConstructors(
   at javafx.fxml.JavaFXBuilderFactory.scanForConstructorAnnotations(
   at javafx.fxml.JavaFXBuilderFactory.getBuilder(
Comment 1 A13XIS 2015-05-09 21:13:51 UTC
Created attachment 153588 [details]
Comment 2 Tomas Hurka 2015-05-10 15:42:26 UTC
There is a lot of javafx related objects. There are 1,271 instances of javafx.scene.control.ListView with retained size of 203,690,475 bytes, which is 21.2% of the whole heap. Reassigning to javafx for further evaluation.
Comment 3 Roman Svitanic 2015-05-11 08:16:36 UTC
The issue is caused by third-party plugin:
Comment 4 Jiri Kovalsky 2015-05-11 09:33:04 UTC
Sven, can you please take a look at this issue? Thanks a lot!
Comment 5 Tomas Hurka 2015-08-04 15:06:59 UTC
*** Bug 254130 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***