This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 40958 - [2004-04-19] apireview of masterfs
Summary: [2004-04-19] apireview of masterfs
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Filesystems (show other bugs)
Version: 4.x
Hardware: All All
: P1 blocker (vote)
Assignee: rmatous
Keywords: API_REVIEW
Depends on: 42014 42038
Blocks: 40703
  Show dependency tree
Reported: 2004-03-12 15:01 UTC by Jaroslav Tulach
Modified: 2008-12-22 23:06 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jaroslav Tulach 2004-03-12 15:01:48 UTC
During review of buildsys (issue 40703) it was
realized that the the buildsys plans to include
masterfs, at least at the time of commit. The
reviewers requested the masterfs to have apireview
as well and asked the buildsys guys to take care
of it.
Comment 1 Jesse Glick 2004-03-12 15:49:01 UTC
Also would like to have a functional spec (can be short but should be
up-to-date w.r.t. what the build system needs from it); unit tests; etc.
Comment 3 rmatous 2004-04-07 15:31:12 UTC
Architecture questions were answered:
Comment 4 Tomas Pavek 2004-04-08 09:38:43 UTC
The review will be held on Apr 14. I will lead the review, Jaroslav
Tulach, Miloslav Metelka and Pavel Buzek will be the other reviewers.
Comment 5 rmatous 2004-04-09 17:36:18 UTC
I think that the friend contract is most appropriate than general SPI
in this case so I changed arch answers and also MasterFS.html with

Then there will be probably necessary to change current public
packages: org.netbeans.api.masterfs.*,org.netbeans.spi.masterfs.*. 
Comment 6 Jesse Glick 2004-04-14 00:53:34 UTC
BTW for those frustrated by the previously given link, better to use
Comment 7 rmatous 2004-04-19 14:28:13 UTC
I hope this issue can be considered as fixed.
Comment 8 Tomas Pavek 2004-04-19 18:02:28 UTC
The opinion document is here:
Comment 9 Zdenek Konecny 2005-08-02 10:30:11 UTC