This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 48638 - [tests] IOE from rename package tests - undo
Summary: [tests] IOE from rename package tests - undo
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 49935
Alias: None
Product: editor
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Refactoring (show other bugs)
Version: 4.x
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@java
URL:
Keywords: RANDOM, T9Y
Depends on:
Blocks: 48217
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2004-09-08 08:41 UTC by ehucka
Modified: 2007-04-03 18:02 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
stacktrace (2.65 KB, text/plain)
2004-09-08 08:42 UTC, ehucka 		Details
ide log (4.46 KB, text/plain)
2004-09-08 09:06 UTC, ehucka 		Details
ide log (4.46 KB, application/octet-stream)
2004-09-08 09:06 UTC, ehucka 		Details
similar stacktrace (2.76 KB, text/plain)
2004-09-16 10:53 UTC, ehucka 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description ehucka 2004-09-08 08:41:27 UTC 
it threw from undo after rename package (move
classes) in automated test. I cannot reproduce it
manually.
Comment 1 ehucka 2004-09-08 08:42:08 UTC 
Created attachment 17456 [details]
stacktrace
Comment 2 ehucka 2004-09-08 09:06:22 UTC 
Created attachment 17465 [details]
ide log
Comment 3 ehucka 2004-09-08 09:06:30 UTC 
Created attachment 17466 [details]
ide log
Comment 4 ehucka 2004-09-14 14:37:13 UTC 
probably caused by issue 48913
Comment 5 Jan Becicka 2004-09-14 14:57:43 UTC 
No more reproducible after fix of issue 48913
Comment 6 ehucka 2004-09-15 08:31:36 UTC 
It seems there still remains some problem. Automated tests' results
show similar symptoms. But more randomly and in less amount (1 of 7).
Comment 7 Jan Becicka 2004-09-16 10:37:05 UTC 
The same stack trace?
Comment 8 ehucka 2004-09-16 10:53:06 UTC 
Created attachment 17680 [details]
similar stacktrace
Comment 9 Martin Matula 2004-09-24 11:43:06 UTC 

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 49002 ***
Comment 10 ehucka 2004-10-06 09:18:23 UTC 
I saw it again on one slower machine. It was thrown from
JavaClassImpl.getSuperclassRef.
Comment 11 Martin Matula 2004-10-08 18:04:59 UTC 

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 49935 ***
Comment 12 ehucka 2006-03-22 09:47:36 UTC 
verified