This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 78466 - Encapsulate fields ignores selection in Editor
Summary: Encapsulate fields ignores selection in Editor
Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 64784
Alias: None
Product: editor
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Refactoring (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: PC All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@java
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-06-20 07:46 UTC by Lukas Hasik
Modified: 2007-04-03 18:02 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
lines selected from begin to end -> all fields checked (147.38 KB, image/jpeg)
2006-06-20 07:48 UTC, Lukas Hasik 		Details
lines NOT selected from begin to end -> one fields checked (145.11 KB, image/jpeg)
2006-06-20 07:49 UTC, Lukas Hasik 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Lukas Hasik 2006-06-20 07:46:44 UTC 
nb060614, jdk1.6

-when I select more then one field in a class and want to encapsulate these
fields then the refactoring dialog select wrong fields
-it select either the first one or all fields
-it depends on the selection

-both cases are in attachment. Look at the selection in editor carefully - when
it is from start to end of line then it selects all fields.
Comment 1 Lukas Hasik 2006-06-20 07:48:55 UTC 
Created attachment 31202 [details]
lines selected from begin to end -> all fields checked
Comment 2 Lukas Hasik 2006-06-20 07:49:32 UTC 
Created attachment 31203 [details]
lines NOT selected from begin to end -> one fields checked
Comment 3 Jiri Prox 2006-06-20 08:17:17 UTC 
The encaps. fields depends only on caret position, if it placed over one field
then this field is selected, otherwise all fields are selected. It doesn't
respect selection in editor. There is already filed an enhancement about it.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 64784 ***
Comment 4 Lukas Hasik 2006-06-20 08:30:44 UTC 
ok, thank you for prompt evaluation.