This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 80928 - Issues with generic methods
Summary: Issues with generic methods
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: uml
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Reverse Engineering (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: All All
: P2 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@uml
URL:
Keywords:
: 90946 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-07-24 10:45 UTC by bugbridge
Modified: 2010-08-16 19:38 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
GenMethDemo.java (1.04 KB, text/plain)
2006-07-24 10:46 UTC, Alexandr Scherbatiy 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description bugbridge 2006-07-24 10:45:33 UTC 
Description:

Steps :
1. Reverse engineer the attached java class.

Issues :
1. In the model tree, the method signature do not reflect its a generic method
2. Drag and drop the "GenMethDemp" class into a class diagram.
   The method in the methods compartment does not show the method's generic nature.
Comment 1 Alexandr Scherbatiy 2006-07-24 10:46:44 UTC 
Created attachment 32127 [details]
GenMethDemo.java
Comment 2 Kris Richards 2006-12-14 23:02:39 UTC 
This is a parser problem that will go away when the UML parser method changes.
Comment 3 George Vasick 2007-05-18 19:15:16 UTC 
Needs to be verified in NB 6.0.
Comment 4 Viktor Lapitski 2007-07-18 01:33:03 UTC 
*** Issue 90946 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 5 Viktor Lapitski 2007-07-18 01:38:13 UTC 
support of template operations and REing of java generic methods into them 
is a feature absent as of now. Implementation of it, i believe, is beyond 
the scope of the release. Thus putting it for the iteam review.
Comment 6 George Vasick 2008-01-15 22:04:47 UTC 
Reviewed and approved for waiver by UML -iteam.
Comment 7 javydreamercsw 2010-08-16 19:38:42 UTC 
Unable to evaluate due to issue #171788.