|
Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Full Text Issue Listing |
| Summary: | WW8: tables in RTL context not imported/imported wrongly in 3.1 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Writer | Reporter: | rene | ||||||
| Component: | open-import | Assignee: | andreas.martens | ||||||
| Status: | CLOSED NOT_AN_OOO_ISSUE | QA Contact: | issues@sw <issues> | ||||||
| Severity: | Trivial | ||||||||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | andre.schnabel, issues | ||||||
| Version: | OOo 3.1 | Keywords: | regression | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||
| Hardware: | Unknown | ||||||||
| OS: | All | ||||||||
| Issue Type: | DEFECT | Latest Confirmation in: | --- | ||||||
| Developer Difficulty: | --- | ||||||||
| Issue Depends on: | |||||||||
| Issue Blocks: | 101565 | ||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
rene
2009-05-17 21:40:35 UTC
Created attachment 62331 [details]
a.doc
Created attachment 62332 [details]
wrong_lands_table.doc
oops, no PATCH but DEFECT can confirm the problem for wrong_lands_table.doc but tha a.doc looks for me the same as the original a.odt (attached to the debian bug) Probably the a.doc/a.odt guy just "misused" the bug for his document (it formerly has the bogus title "doesn't import my document correctly anymore", which of course is such not generic that you can drive truck trough that hole) but then again, the NUS thing is left in 3.1 whereas right in 2.4.1 and 2.4.1 shows the table borders whereas 3.1 doesn't. (didn't try on 3.0 with this doc) s/left in 3.1 whereas right in 2.4.1/right in 3.1 whereas left in 2.4.1/ "Only" occurs on 64-Linux builds. Already tracked as issue 101451. Table is not lost - it has wrong spacings. Edit the table via Navigator as workaround. *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 101451 *** Closing duplicate. mru: Actually, the submitter of this bug in Debian says it also happens on 32bit for him > Do not re-open issue 102004 as long as there are two different documents
> attached to it.
Actualkly, I will, because the bugreport *was* about wrong_lands_table.doc.
That you don't read linked bugs is not my problem, but the initial bug was
filed for wrong_lands_table.doc
regression -> target 3.1.1 > Actualkly, I will, because the bug report *was* about wrong_lands_table.doc.
> That you don't read linked bugs is not my problem, but the initial bug was
MRU->rene: So why didn't you mention "wrong_lands_table.doc" in desc1? You only
talked about a.doc there!
Reading linked issues from other system should not be necessary in any case if
you would have posted a correct issue description.
AMA is of course not the correct owner for WW8 import bugs.
I will file a new issue for the "table in RTL context"; this one here is of
course not convenient to read and handle.
closed. > MRU->rene: So why didn't you mention "wrong_lands_table.doc" in desc1? You only > talked about a.doc there! Because I referenced the bug. That I posted a full link has its reason. That is the canonical place of the initial bug. The rest is just copy/paste and transcription, and indedd the second comment in theat bug had a.odt in its text. The initial post said "i will attach the file." - what he did (wrong_lands_table.doc) > Reading linked issues from other system should not be necessary in any case if > you would have posted a correct issue description. See above. I just pasted what the submitters' said. (And attached their docs). > I will file a new issue for the "table in RTL context"; this one here is of > course not convenient to read and handle. OK. Issue nr I can mark http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=528836 forwarded to? ah, issue 103357 |