Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Full Text Issue Listing |
Summary: | Substraction error | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Calc | Reporter: | ruonim <ruonim> |
Component: | code | Assignee: | AOO issues mailing list <issues> |
Status: | CONFIRMED --- | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | Trivial | ||
Priority: | P3 | CC: | acelists, issues, jbf.faure, rb.henschel |
Version: | OOO310m11 | Keywords: | oooqa |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unknown | ||
OS: | Windows, all | ||
Issue Type: | DEFECT | Latest Confirmation in: | --- |
Developer Difficulty: | --- |
Description
ruonim
2009-05-19 10:48:26 UTC
I think, OOo should be more accurate, when the arguments are pure integral numbers. As far as I see, in interpr5.cxx the function approxSub is used for subtracting in all cases. This calls approxEqual, which forces the result to zero, if the difference is in the last three bits. I am right? If yes, I suggest to make a case distinction whether the values are pure integral numbers or not and use a simple minus, when both are pure integral numbers. As far as I know, IEEE double is accurate up to the last bit in adding, subtracting and multiplying, in the range of integral numbers. Why should OOo intentially reduce accuracy? |