Issue 10335

Summary: Issuezilla: No point in requiring people to 'join' catagories to submit issues
Product: QA Reporter: Unknown <non-migrated>
Component: wwwAssignee: Joost Andrae <Joost.Andrae>
Status: CLOSED IRREPRODUCIBLE QA Contact: issues@qa <issues>
Severity: Trivial    
Priority: P4 CC: issues
Version: current   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: PC   
OS: Other OS   
Issue Type: DEFECT Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Description Unknown 2002-12-29 05:38:21 UTC
> I have registered and am submitting bugs, but I see the following
> problems with the registration interface.  (Which, I suppose,
> is why I'm writing you instead of entering the issues into the
> database.)

> 2) I have to go through the same approval process for each
> catagory of bug I want to submit.  I've already submitted
> a general windowing problem to the spreadsheet project just
> because if I didn't submit it then, it wouldn't have gotten
> submitteed.  (Oh yeah, and another gripe about not being able
> to start multiple instances of OO.  Partly they went to the
> spreadsheet project because I didn't know where to put them,
> but I didn't bother investigating either because I knew I wouldn't
> be able to submit the problem there.  I still haven't signed up
> for anything other than writer and spreadsheet.)
> 
> (Is there a 'general' catagory where people can submit problems
> when they don't know where the problem belongs?  That might make
> for a quick triage, closing out the useless ones right away, and
> improve classification accuracy as there'd be a knowledgeable
> person sorting them out.  On the other hand it could encourage
> people to be lazy.)
> 
> Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but the whole approval process is
> silly.  Is somebody doing a background check each time an unknown person
> requests permissions to submit bugs?  No.  So why isn't approval
> automatic?  I suppose I can understand
> wanting to blacklist somebody who's useless, requiring approval
> before they can join more projects.  But the default should be
> to make it as easy as possible for people to report problems.
> (Forcing a search of the database to prevent duplicate entries
> is another story, natch.)
>
Comment 1 Martin Hollmichel 2005-04-04 16:44:46 UTC
reassign.
Comment 2 Joost Andrae 2005-04-04 17:03:43 UTC
ja->kpinc: As Stefan Taxhet already stated out in issue 10334 your problem was
related to an earlier version of the IssueTracker bugtracking system. It should
be fixed. If you see any problems related to submitting issues then don't
hesitate to reopen this issue. Resolving this issue as "worksforme"
Comment 3 Joost Andrae 2005-04-04 17:04:07 UTC
JA: closing issue