|
Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Full Text Issue Listing |
| Summary: | OpenOffice package doesn't install a English dictionary and no error is reported to warn user | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | General | Reporter: | richburridge <rich.burridge> |
| Component: | code | Assignee: | mdxonefour |
| Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | issues@framework <issues> |
| Severity: | Trivial | ||
| Priority: | P2 | CC: | ingo.schmidt-rosbiegal, issues, joachim.lingner, mdxonefour, thomas.lange |
| Version: | OOo 3.1 | ||
| Target Milestone: | OOo 3.2 | ||
| Hardware: | Sun | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Issue Type: | DEFECT | Latest Confirmation in: | --- |
| Developer Difficulty: | --- | ||
| Issue Depends on: | |||
| Issue Blocks: | 99999 | ||
|
Description
richburridge
2009-07-23 16:19:35 UTC
Which build did you install ? It's the version of OpenOffice 3.1 that is available with OpenSolaris 2009.06. I'll track this on the OpenSolaris Bugzilla... Looking at your comments in the OpenSolaris Bugzilla it looks like package problem (framework). I can tell if the issue is on our side or OpenSolaris... @OF: Please have a look. ------- Comment #3 From Rich Burridge 2009-07-24 07:39:01 ------- I was thinking a bit about this yesterday as I was moving it over... The OpenOffice packages on OpenSolaris are derived from the SVR4 packages. One of the things that the package manager doesn't do at install time on OpenSolaris, is run any scripts (such as postinstall scripts). Now I was wondering whether there was such a postinstall script for OpenOffice and whether it didn't anything to setup spell checking. If there is, then you will need to work out what the equivalent actions are in the OpenSolaris world. Just a thought. It might be something else completely. ----------------------- @ jl: Do you have details about this problem? Installation of the dictionaries on OpenSolaris fails because they need a post install script being executed. See issue 158698 (Bugtracker, NOT bugster). Therefore this would be a duplicate. On the other hand, on could argue that if no dictionary is installed, then there should be a spell check menu entry. Then this issue belongs to TL. @OF: You decide. Basically even if no dictionary extension is provided it might be possible to spell check anyway. After all our extension dictionaries are hunspell specific! If you can install a spellchecker that does not need them spell checking would still be possible. An example for this would be the Duden-Korrektor extension (it comes along with everything it needs!) Also (at least in Writer) the same menu entry is also used for grammar checking. And currently all grammar checkers are installed as extension and bring all their required data along. For example Language-Tool. Even with no spell checker installed the menu entry would still be useful if a grammar checker is installed! According to our offline discussion and the inhouse issue I'm adjusting prio target and owner. . . @richburridge, the issue should be fixed in CWS jl133 but i don't have the means to verify it thoroughly. Can you possibly check it? Otherwise i would just rely on jl's fix. To me. Set verified. Close MD: Reopening this issue because CWS jl133 is not yet integrated into 3.2 code line by intention. So far we didn't receive any confirmation from OSOL team, that the proposed fix is really sufficiant in point of view to IPS packaging and the OSOL Repository. Currently JL is trying to get such feedback on OSOL mailing lists. MD: Setting back to fixed. MD: Setting to Verified again. NOTE: This issue was verified by OOo development/qa but we are still waiting for verification from OSOL. This issue is badly placed in my intray because i'm not likely to get any feedback from the OSOL-guys. To MD. MD: The correpsonding CWS has already been integrated. |