Issue 105322

Summary: Note lost on save/Crash
Product: Writer Reporter: mux2005 <mux2005>
Component: save-exportAssignee: eric.savary
Status: CLOSED FIXED QA Contact: issues@sw <issues>
Severity: Trivial    
Priority: P2 CC: issues, Mathias_Bauer, max.odendahl
Version: DEV300m58Keywords: regression
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: Unknown   
OS: All   
Issue Type: DEFECT Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---
Description Flags
Open for template editing. Touch. Save. Annotation is gone. none

Description mux2005 2009-09-24 11:12:31 UTC
1. Open writer
2. File/Templates/Edit...
3. Open the attached file
4. Take note that the file has an annotation
5. Change something in the text
6. Save
7. File/Reload
8. The annotation is gone. Apparently it has not been saved.

Tested under Windows and Linux.

Data loss + Regression => P2
Comment 1 mux2005 2009-09-24 11:13:49 UTC
Created attachment 64927 [details]
Open for template editing. Touch. Save. Annotation is gone.
Comment 2 mux2005 2009-09-24 11:18:41 UTC
Also happens when you simply use the template, i.e. Open it so that you get an
Untitled document. Save that document. Annotation is lost.
Comment 3 eric.savary 2009-09-24 11:52:27 UTC
@MOD: my tests show that the combination frame in the margin at the bottom of
page and containing a note (as in this document) leads to a crash or at best the
frame loses its position at the bottom.
In the bugdoc, the frame gets lost.

I couldn't reproduce this in m51 (milestone before integration of CWS Notes10 >;-)).

Do you you think all those findings are the same issue?
Comment 4 max.odendahl 2009-09-24 12:17:50 UTC
I cannot reproduce this with notes10. As this is reported against m58, but
notes10 is integrated in m59, I would think there is another reason for this
regression, probably a writer cws between m51 and m58.

If the frame is lost due to a bug, the annotation is gone as well of course.

@es: please reassign to od or os I guess
Comment 5 mux2005 2009-09-24 12:42:55 UTC
As this is a regression causing data loss, I think it should be a release
blocker for 3.2.
Comment 6 mux2005 2009-10-07 18:01:36 UTC
I repeat my question: Why is a regression that causes data loss not a release
blocker? Isn't this the worst kind of bug possible?
Comment 7 eric.savary 2009-10-07 19:58:16 UTC
@mux2005; Thank you for the ping! Yes you're right but as I just checked, it is
not reproducible anymore in a current m60 (we've fixed a bunch of note issues in
this milestone).

Can you confirm?
Comment 8 mux2005 2009-10-08 14:27:41 UTC
Yes. The problem seems to be fixed in m60.
Comment 9 max.odendahl 2009-10-08 14:32:33 UTC
Comment 10 max.odendahl 2009-10-08 14:32:51 UTC
Comment 11 eric.savary 2009-10-23 11:05:05 UTC
*** Issue 106211 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***