Issue 105322

Summary:

Note lost on save/Crash

Product:

Writer

Reporter:

mux2005 <mux2005>

Component:

save-export

Assignee:

eric.savary

Status:

CLOSED FIXED

QA Contact:

issues@sw <issues>

Severity:

Trivial

Priority:

CC:

issues, Mathias_Bauer, max.odendahl

Version:

DEV300m58

Keywords:

regression

Target Milestone:

---

Hardware:

Unknown

OS:

All

Issue Type:

DEFECT

Latest Confirmation in:

---

Developer Difficulty:

---

Attachments:

Description	Flags
Open for template editing. Touch. Save. Annotation is gone.	none

Description mux2005 2009-09-24 11:12:31 UTC

1. Open writer
2. File/Templates/Edit...
3. Open the attached file test.ott
4. Take note that the file has an annotation
5. Change something in the text
6. Save
7. File/Reload
8. The annotation is gone. Apparently it has not been saved.

Tested under Windows and Linux.

Data loss + Regression => P2

Comment 1 mux2005 2009-09-24 11:13:49 UTC

Created attachment 64927 [details]
Open for template editing. Touch. Save. Annotation is gone.

Comment 2 mux2005 2009-09-24 11:18:41 UTC

Also happens when you simply use the template, i.e. Open it so that you get an
Untitled document. Save that document. Annotation is lost.

Comment 3 eric.savary 2009-09-24 11:52:27 UTC

@MOD: my tests show that the combination frame in the margin at the bottom of
page and containing a note (as in this document) leads to a crash or at best the
frame loses its position at the bottom.
In the bugdoc, the frame gets lost.

I couldn't reproduce this in m51 (milestone before integration of CWS Notes10 >;-)).

Do you you think all those findings are the same issue?

Comment 4 max.odendahl 2009-09-24 12:17:50 UTC

I cannot reproduce this with notes10. As this is reported against m58, but
notes10 is integrated in m59, I would think there is another reason for this
regression, probably a writer cws between m51 and m58.

If the frame is lost due to a bug, the annotation is gone as well of course.

@es: please reassign to od or os I guess

Comment 5 mux2005 2009-09-24 12:42:55 UTC

As this is a regression causing data loss, I think it should be a release
blocker for 3.2.

Comment 6 mux2005 2009-10-07 18:01:36 UTC

I repeat my question: Why is a regression that causes data loss not a release
blocker? Isn't this the worst kind of bug possible?

Comment 7 eric.savary 2009-10-07 19:58:16 UTC

@mux2005; Thank you for the ping! Yes you're right but as I just checked, it is
not reproducible anymore in a current m60 (we've fixed a bunch of note issues in
this milestone).

Can you confirm?

Comment 8 mux2005 2009-10-08 14:27:41 UTC

Yes. The problem seems to be fixed in m60.

Comment 9 max.odendahl 2009-10-08 14:32:33 UTC

closing

Comment 10 max.odendahl 2009-10-08 14:32:51 UTC

Comment 11 eric.savary 2009-10-23 11:05:05 UTC

*** Issue 106211 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***