Issue 112784

Summary:

bridges: ContextAdmin singleton

Product:

udk

Reporter:

caolanm

Component:

code

Assignee:

Stephan Bergmann <stephan.bergmann.secondary>

Status:

CLOSED FIXED

QA Contact:

issues@udk <issues>

Severity:

Trivial

Priority:

CC:

issues

Version:

DEV300m83

Target Milestone:

4.0.0

Hardware:

All

OS:

Linux, all

Issue Type:

PATCH

Latest Confirmation in:

---

Developer Difficulty:

---

Issue Depends on:

Issue Blocks:

112782

Attachments:

Description	Flags
like so	none

Description caolanm 2010-06-29 13:23:50 UTC

So, what goes wrong if we make the bridges ContextAdmin a well-behaved singleton
as attached ?

I've a unopkg install/list/deinstall loop under valgrind which doesn't trigger
any errors so far (when combined with the rest of this parents dependencies)

Comment 1 caolanm 2010-06-29 13:24:20 UTC

Created attachment 70289 [details]
like so

Comment 2 Stephan Bergmann 2010-06-29 14:14:18 UTC

looks harmless at first sight  ;)

Comment 3 Stephan Bergmann 2010-07-02 14:59:02 UTC

attached bridges.contextadmin.singleton.patch applied as
<http://hg.services.openoffice.org/cws/sb126/rev/930d64afebdb>; issue 63397 and
issue 63473 probably made ContextAdmin leak for good reason, but I could not
produce any problems so far, either (checking on Solaris x86 and Sparc)

Comment 4 Stephan Bergmann 2010-07-15 09:26:03 UTC

Comment 5 Stephan Bergmann 2010-10-06 14:22:58 UTC