Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Full Text Issue Listing
|Summary:||Connector line of cell comments misplaced in big tables|
|Status:||CLOSED FIXED||QA Contact:||issues@sc <issues>|
|Priority:||P3||CC:||daniel.rentz, helenrussian, issues, kpalagin, mdxonefour, mechtilde, nesshof, vitriol_vitriol|
|Version:||OOo 3.3 RC3||Keywords:||oooqa, regression|
|Issue Type:||DEFECT||Latest Confirmation in:||---|
|Issue Depends on:|
Description mr_smyle 2010-10-29 13:06:45 UTC
Look in attached document to position of the comment to cell E262. It looks like comment to E269. Look picture with some data also. If delete some columns from F to Z - shift length will became smaller.
Comment 3 helenrussian 2010-11-01 13:37:35 UTC
Not confirm with OOo 3.2.1 Confirm with OOo 3.3 RC3. Linux.
Comment 4 mr_smyle 2010-11-01 13:45:05 UTC
This is very new issue (may be from m7..m9 release). Because I use all beta versions and I don't remember this. Additionally, comments shows only for 1 second (mouse cursor over cell and not moving) on first Calc run with this document. After 3 times comment not appear on screen, until change active cell. Is it possible fix this for 3.3 now?
Comment 5 mr_smyle 2010-11-01 14:01:07 UTC
The same in OOo300m91.
Comment 6 vitriol 2010-11-01 16:30:04 UTC
Add me to CC
Comment 7 kpalagin 2010-11-01 16:35:21 UTC
I have suggested this regression as release stopper for 3.3.
Comment 8 Mechtilde 2010-11-01 17:25:23 UTC
I can reproduce this problem. you have really to look at rows with mubers higher than 130. then you can see the problem
Comment 9 daniel.rentz 2010-11-02 10:33:46 UTC
Taking this issue
Comment 10 daniel.rentz 2010-11-02 11:31:12 UTC
Confirmed. This problem is unrelated to notes but happens with all drawing shapes. You can test that if you insert a small rectangle in row 262 and see that the anchor icon is drawn in row 251 (this means Calc thinks the shape is in row 251). Of course, it is most obvious with notes, as they want to draw a connector line to their cell.
Comment 11 mdxonefour 2010-11-02 16:21:02 UTC
md: adjusting target
Comment 12 daniel.rentz 2010-11-03 09:25:45 UTC
fixed in CWS OOO330/calc33stopper2 for OOo 3.3
Comment 13 daniel.rentz 2010-11-03 09:29:17 UTC
back to QA
Comment 14 oc 2010-11-03 17:41:27 UTC
verified in internal build cws_calc33stopper2
Comment 15 mr_smyle 2010-12-18 14:56:22 UTC
Please, look attached files.
Comment 16 mr_smyle 2010-12-18 14:57:59 UTC
Created attachment 75370 [details] Same for cells E103, E105, E108 etc.
Comment 18 vitriol 2010-12-18 15:28:18 UTC
Same behavior in OOo 3.2.1 with li_base.ods. It doesn't seen a 3.3 regression.
Comment 19 tommy27 2011-01-06 12:49:53 UTC
so what did they fix in November 2010?
Comment 20 tommy27 2011-01-12 12:23:14 UTC
OOo 3.3 RC9 is out. is this issue fixed or unfixed?
Comment 21 tommy27 2011-01-19 18:45:19 UTC
RC10 is out. please check the status of this issue. actually it's the only 3.3 stopper to be still open
Comment 22 niklas.nebel 2011-01-20 09:28:07 UTC
This issue is about the regression compared to 3.2.1, and only that was accepted as stopper. The behavior with li_base.ods is the same as in 3.2.1 (see issue 83644). I'll set this issue back to "fixed" because the regression has been corrected.
Comment 23 niklas.nebel 2011-01-20 09:28:33 UTC
back to verified