Issue 12296

Summary: Generated HTML contains nested DL elements
Product: Writer Reporter: Unknown <non-migrated>
Component: codeAssignee: AOO issues mailing list <issues>
Status: ACCEPTED --- QA Contact:
Severity: Trivial    
Priority: P4 CC: issues, oooqa
Version: OOo 1.0.0Keywords: oooqa
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: PC   
OS: Windows NT   
Issue Type: DEFECT Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---
Description Flags
Export this doc to HTML none

Description Unknown 2003-03-13 03:51:10 UTC
(generated from document attached to 12294)
The generated HTML contains nested DL elements:
 925   <DL>
 926   	<DL>
 927   		<DD>
 972   		</TABLE>
 973   	</DL>
 974   </DL>

DL can only contain DD and DT.
Also, if you have a DD you should precede it with a DT, even if you're going to
be generic and just say "some table."
Comment 1 prgmgr 2003-06-26 19:44:26 UTC
Created attachment 7167 [details]
Export this doc to HTML
Comment 2 prgmgr 2003-06-26 20:02:18 UTC
Rick, you are correct again.

<DL> can only contain <DD> or <DT> elements.

However it is legal to nest <DL> elements inside <DD> elements.
Comment 4 h.ilter 2003-06-30 10:35:58 UTC
Reassigned to ES
Comment 5 eric.savary 2003-07-07 10:51:39 UTC
ES->MIB: please evaluate
Comment 6 michael.brauer 2003-08-19 09:21:44 UTC
Since the document is loaded again and rendered correctly by other
user agents P4 seems to be the correct priority.
Comment 7 Unknown 2003-08-19 19:09:54 UTC
"...the document is loaded again and rendered correctly by other user

IMNSHO it's rendered poorly.  The size of the indent is not defined by
any specification, or even if it should indent.
That being said, proper indentation under HTML 3.2 isn't a trivial
Comment 8 andreas.martens 2003-09-12 15:09:51 UTC
Comment 9 eric.savary 2003-09-30 17:37:33 UTC
According to the roadmap 
( this issue was retargeted to 
OOo Later.