|
Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Full Text Issue Listing |
| Summary: | data->validity - criteria - sort checkbox will not saved after reopen | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Calc | Reporter: | algroeschel | ||||||
| Component: | configuration | Assignee: | AOO issues mailing list <issues> | ||||||
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |||||||
| Severity: | Normal | ||||||||
| Priority: | P5 (lowest) | CC: | knmc, oooforum | ||||||
| Version: | 4.1.5 | ||||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||
| Hardware: | PC | ||||||||
| OS: | All | ||||||||
| Issue Type: | DEFECT | Latest Confirmation in: | --- | ||||||
| Developer Difficulty: | --- | ||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
I don't reproduce with AOO 4.1.5 and Win7 x64 Pro Note that source must contain valid field with sheetname. Could you provide a sample document? Created attachment 86305 [details]
Excample where sort will not saved. Doc is in Format Excel 97/2000/XP. If this doc will be saved as .ods, the error disappear.
Hello, it seems that the issue comes with the file fomat Excel 97/2000/XP! I tried this with my original doc and a brand new sheet with the same result: with "Excel 97/2000/XP" format the error is here with ".ods" format, the error disappear For me, I'll change the format to .ods. The Excel format was because of history. Anyhow, it would be fine when this behaviour will be fixed. MS interop already reported *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 26928 *** |
Created attachment 86304 [details] screenshot of validity dialog Hello, the check box "sort entries ascending" will not saved after reopen document or restart calc. Config: "Allow": Cell range "Allow empty celles": checked "Show selection list": checked "Sort entries ascending": checked but unchecked after reopen of document or restart of calc and open the doc. "Source": selection of fields eg. B33:B62 Language german, englisch; OS: XP, W7 It would be fine to fix this issue. After a reopen of the doc I have to set this checkbox on 65 fields bevore I can work with this doc proper. Best regards, Andreas