Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Full Text Issue Listing |
Summary: | AT tool (ZoomText): Edit fields are not read | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | ui | Reporter: | eric.savary |
Component: | code | Assignee: | eric.savary |
Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | issues@ui <issues> |
Severity: | Trivial | ||
Priority: | P3 | CC: | christoph.lukasiak, eric.savary, frank.schoenheit, issues, malte_timmermann, nospam4obr |
Version: | OOo 1.1 Beta | Keywords: | accessibility |
Target Milestone: | OOo 2.0 | ||
Hardware: | PC | ||
OS: | Windows XP | ||
Issue Type: | DEFECT | Latest Confirmation in: | --- |
Developer Difficulty: | --- |
Description
eric.savary
2003-04-07 16:01:36 UTC
adding myself to CC because this also means that ZoomText doesn't read one of the main controls in the DBA area (table view in the data source browser) MT->ES: Seems to be fixed with ZT8.02, please verify. Yes it's fixed! closed i cannot approve that - for example in control property browser or form property browser neither the content nor the label is read in edit fields, as ES has acknowledged - in combo and list boxes the label is not read so i reopen this task clu->mt: sorry, your turn again MT->CGU: Please distinguish between pure edit fields in dialogs and combinded controls... ES->CLU: and I also would distinguish between edit fields in dialogs and toolbar an edit fields in floatings (I think those last only have this problem). I'd like to keep this issue closed and open a new one. ->MT: what do you think? CLU->MT: i think you have mistaken my member code (cgu<->clu) and speak to me: (MT->CGU: Please distinguish between pure edit fields in dialogs and combinded controls...) -> how should i do that? - is there a difference visuable or anything else i could distinguish - for me they look equal? CLU->ES: seems that the fields i mean, are not 'real' edit fields, but anything combined - writing a new issue seems not necessary, because the old ones were closed double to this here (therfore i reopend this issue) and i will reopen them CLU->ES: i reopend task 104888 and 104887 - both were closed as double to 102189 - this bug is fixed not fully, because the two, i have reopend, are not fixed - this task (102189) was mirrored in the current (i13126) task ES->CLU: as discussed. We'll keep your bug 104888 open. This one is to general zo correspond to the present problem. closed |