Issue 18792

Summary:	caret placed wrong after undo and redo with deleted footnotes
Product:	Writer	Reporter:	lars <lars_o_hansen>
Component:	code	Assignee:	AOO issues mailing list <issues>
Status:	CONFIRMED ---	QA Contact:
Severity:	Trivial
Priority:	P4	CC:	issues
Version:	OOo 1.1 RC4
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	PC
OS:	All
Issue Type:	DEFECT	Latest Confirmation in:	---
Developer Difficulty:	---

Description lars 2003-08-28 23:39:07 UTC

caret placed wrong after undo and redo with deleted footnotes:

1. open Writer
2. type fffg
3. insert footnte
4. type ss as footnote
5. click with mouse in first line of page after the footnote symbol so that 
caret is behind the footnote symbol
6. backspace 2 times, so delete footnote and g
7. undo twice (footnote symbol is highlighted now)
8. redo once: caret is between last f and g :  defect !

Comment 1 jack.warchold 2003-09-11 15:12:02 UTC

reproduced on OOo1.1RC4
set Prio to P4
set taget to OOo later
set os to all
sert version to OOo1.1RC4
reassigned to fme
set status to new

Comment 2 ace_dent 2008-05-16 02:38:44 UTC

OpenOffice.org Issue Tracker - Feedback Request.

The Issue you raised has the status 'New' pending further action, but has not
been updated within the last 4 years. Please consider re-testing with one of the
latest versions of OOo, as the problem(s) may have already been addressed.
Either use the recent stable version: http://download.openoffice.org/index.html
or consider trying the new OOo 3 BETA (still in testing):
http://download.openoffice.org/3.0beta/
 
Please report back the outcome so this Issue may be Closed or Progressed as
necessary - otherwise it may be Resolved as Invalid in the future. You may also
wish to search for (and note) any duplicates of this Issue that may have
advanced further by checking the Issue Tracker:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/query.cgi
 
Many thanks,
Andrew
 
Cleaning-up and Closing old Issues as part of:
~ The Grand Bug Squash, pre v3 ~
http://marketing.openoffice.org/3.0/announcementbeta.html

Comment 3 lars 2008-05-17 19:46:24 UTC

issue still valid as per OOo 3.0 Beta m2.


let's hope this is an independant defect not concerning any general undo system 
code or counter, offsets or pointers (here's a +-1 counter error)