Issue 19929

Summary:

Automatic numbering sequence looses chapter number in master document

Product:

Writer

Reporter:

khbellgardt <bellgardt>

Component:

code

Assignee:

eric.savary

Status:

CLOSED DUPLICATE

QA Contact:

issues@sw <issues>

Severity:

Trivial

Priority:

CC:

issues

Version:

OOo 1.1 RC4

Keywords:

oooqa

Target Milestone:

---

Hardware:

OS:

Windows XP

Issue Type:

DEFECT

Latest Confirmation in:

---

Developer Difficulty:

---

Attachments:

Description	Flags
Master document and two text documents showing the numbering problem	none

Description khbellgardt 2003-09-23 10:04:46 UTC

I have text documents where a numbering range variable "Table" is defined. The
numbering-by-chapter-level is set to one for this variable. In the text
documents all runs well with the automatic numbering. But when the text
documents are included in a master document the chapter number is lost and the
numbering sequence ist continued over all chapters: In the first document I have
table 1.1 and 1.2, in the second 2.1 to 2.3, but in the master document it is
Table 1 to 5.

Comment 1 khbellgardt 2003-09-23 10:08:06 UTC

Created attachment 9592 [details]
Master document and two text documents showing the numbering problem

Comment 2 mci 2003-09-24 17:12:43 UTC

reassigned to es

Comment 3 flibby05 2004-03-22 15:04:57 UTC

confirmed with 1.1.1rc3 linux build,

maybe similar to issue 11174?

Comment 4 lib 2004-06-10 07:42:12 UTC

Verlust der Kapitel-Nummer bei Abbildungen:
Es scheint sich um eine VerzÃ¶gerung in der Aktualisierung zu handeln. Wenn ich
irgendwas in dem Globaldokument tue, wie z.B. ein Verzeichnis aktualisieren oder
in die Seitenansicht und wieder zurÃ¼ck schalte, werden die Kapitelnummern wieder
angezeigt.
I try in english:
missing chapter numbering of illustrations in global documents:
when doing something in the global document that actualizes it - so as
actualizing an index or change to/come back from page preview, the chapter
numbering is shown  corectly.

Comment 5 khbellgardt 2004-06-10 07:54:45 UTC

The previous comment from lib is related to OOo 1.1.1

Comment 6 eric.savary 2004-12-02 16:31:35 UTC

Yes, it's a duplicate

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 11174 ***

Comment 7 eric.savary 2004-12-02 16:32:13 UTC

closed