Issue 2181

Summary:	next OpenOffice.org build on Linux with gcc3 (x86)
Product:	Build Tools	Reporter:	Martin Hollmichel <nesshof>
Component:	code	Assignee:	sander_traveling
Status:	CLOSED FIXED	QA Contact:	issues@tools <issues>
Severity:	Trivial
Priority:	P2	CC:	issues
Version:	current
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	PC
OS:	Linux, all
Issue Type:	TASK	Latest Confirmation in:	---
Developer Difficulty:	---
Issue Depends on:
Issue Blocks:	2308

Description Martin Hollmichel 2001-11-12 15:00:00 UTC

the openoffice.org build OO641C (mid december build) should be build with gcc3
(unxlngi4.mk Environment).

Comment 1 khendricks 2001-11-29 19:49:47 UTC

Hi,

FYI, even now gcc 3.x can not be used to compile the latest glibc 
(they are still arguing over implementation details and where 
exceptions are handled and etc.  See the GNU glibc alpha 
mailing list for more info about the incompatibilities between 
glibc 2.2.4 and earlier and gcc 3.X

As I understand things there are also still gcc 3 issues in 
building the linux kernel the last time I looked.

So I would not convert to using gcc 3.X *only* yet.  I think it is 
more important to use the latest binutils and glibc to speed up 
OpenOffice startup using the prelinking support just added.  You 
can do this using the current gcc.

My 2 cents,

Kevin

Comment 2 Martin Hollmichel 2001-11-29 19:54:09 UTC

ok, no problem with that, but may be we should be more precise: we
want at least on the x86 platform use the gcc3 toolchain, other
platform are to be evaluated.

Comment 3 Martin Hollmichel 2001-12-04 15:13:25 UTC

Hi Sander, 

are they problems with the configuration of gcc3 on LinuxX86, the
status of this issue is still new ?

Comment 4 sander_traveling 2002-01-02 13:15:13 UTC

changing status to accept -> the build was deliveered built with gcc3,
but i want to check a couple of things

Comment 5 Martin Hollmichel 2002-02-21 09:39:49 UTC

the compiler should be switchable in the OOO_STBLE_1 build. Are you 
able to check in all your changes ?

Comment 6 stx123 2002-03-12 17:50:21 UTC

Has all work for this issue been done?

Comment 7 sander_traveling 2002-03-18 01:56:05 UTC

yes, so closing

Comment 8 Martin Hollmichel 2002-04-15 13:15:56 UTC

veryfied

Comment 9 michael.bemmer 2003-03-13 11:14:13 UTC

As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved
<wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for details.