Issue 23901

Summary: bridgetest_client leaking object instance
Product: udk Reporter: sparcmoz <sparcmoz>
Component: codeAssignee: AOO issues mailing list <issues>
Status: ACCEPTED --- QA Contact:
Severity: Trivial    
Priority: P4 CC: issues
Version: 680   
Target Milestone: AOO PleaseHelp   
Hardware: Sun   
OS: Linux, all   
Issue Type: DEFECT Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---
Issue Depends on:    
Issue Blocks: 23900    

Description sparcmoz 2003-12-27 07:59:52 UTC
Is this a problem?
linux sparc cws_src680_ooo20031216

 ### test succeeded!
jim@sun:~/680/o2_src/testtools/$ ./bridgetest_server&
[1] 13740
> accepting socket,host=localhost,port=2002...
jim@sun:~/680/o2_src/testtools/$ ./bridgetest_client
connection established.
> accepting socket,host=localhost,port=2002...
 ### leaking object instance!
 ### test succeeded!
Comment 1 Daniel Boelzle [:dbo] 2003-12-29 10:59:43 UTC
KSO ought to have a look at this, I put him on CC.
Comment 2 sparcmoz 2003-12-31 03:48:22 UTC
same with java test:  ### leaking object instance!

jim@sun:~/680/o2_src/testtools/$ ./bridgetest_inprocess_java
tried to query for an interface reference of an unknown type but got a runtime
exception. This should work for native bridges but isn't implemented for Java
remote bridge
Note: All subsequent tests may fail now as the remote bridge is broken
 ### leaking object instance!
 ### test succeeded!
Comment 3 kay.ramme 2004-01-06 14:00:32 UTC
Kai, please take care of this and target appropriately.
Comment 4 kai.sommerfeld 2004-01-06 14:46:01 UTC
Removing myself from CC
Comment 5 kai.sommerfeld 2004-01-08 07:52:36 UTC
Accepted. Target set to OOo 2.0
Comment 6 kai.sommerfeld 2004-05-07 09:08:39 UTC
Adjusted priority to P4.
Comment 7 Martin Hollmichel 2004-05-28 17:35:03 UTC
according to the announcement on releases
( this issue
will be re-targeted to OOo Later.
Comment 8 kai.sommerfeld 2005-12-14 10:11:44 UTC
Stephan, can you please take care of this.
Comment 9 Stephan Bergmann 2005-12-14 10:58:31 UTC
I always thought that the leaking was by design, and not an error, but I may
well be wrong, and I will have a look.
Comment 10 Marcus 2017-05-20 11:29:59 UTC
Reset assigne to the default "".