Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Full Text Issue Listing
|Summary:||bridgetest_client leaking object instance|
|Component:||code||Assignee:||AOO issues mailing list <issues>|
|Status:||ACCEPTED ---||QA Contact:|
|Target Milestone:||AOO PleaseHelp|
|Issue Type:||DEFECT||Latest Confirmation in:||---|
|Issue Depends on:|
Description sparcmoz 2003-12-27 07:59:52 UTC
Is this a problem? linux sparc cws_src680_ooo20031216 ./bridgetest_inprocess ### test succeeded! jim@sun:~/680/o2_src/testtools/unxlngs.pro/lib$ ./bridgetest_server&  13740 jim@sun:~/680/o2_src/testtools/unxlngs.pro/lib$ > accepting socket,host=localhost,port=2002... jim@sun:~/680/o2_src/testtools/unxlngs.pro/lib$ ./bridgetest_client connection established. > accepting socket,host=localhost,port=2002... ### leaking object instance! ### test succeeded!
Comment 1 Daniel Boelzle [:dbo] 2003-12-29 10:59:43 UTC
KSO ought to have a look at this, I put him on CC.
Comment 2 sparcmoz 2003-12-31 03:48:22 UTC
same with java test: ### leaking object instance! jim@sun:~/680/o2_src/testtools/unxlngs.pro/lib$ ./bridgetest_inprocess_java tried to query for an interface reference of an unknown type but got a runtime exception. This should work for native bridges but isn't implemented for Java remote bridge Note: All subsequent tests may fail now as the remote bridge is broken QueryForUnknownType ### leaking object instance! ### test succeeded!
Comment 3 kay.ramme 2004-01-06 14:00:32 UTC
Kai, please take care of this and target appropriately.
Comment 4 kai.sommerfeld 2004-01-06 14:46:01 UTC
Removing myself from CC
Comment 5 kai.sommerfeld 2004-01-08 07:52:36 UTC
Accepted. Target set to OOo 2.0
Comment 6 kai.sommerfeld 2004-05-07 09:08:39 UTC
Adjusted priority to P4.
Comment 7 Martin Hollmichel 2004-05-28 17:35:03 UTC
according to the announcement on releases (http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=releases&msgNo=7503) this issue will be re-targeted to OOo Later.
Comment 8 kai.sommerfeld 2005-12-14 10:11:44 UTC
Stephan, can you please take care of this.
Comment 9 Stephan Bergmann 2005-12-14 10:58:31 UTC
I always thought that the leaking was by design, and not an error, but I may well be wrong, and I will have a look.