Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Full Text Issue Listing |
Summary: | underbrace/overbrace not displayed correctly | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Math | Reporter: | hello_world <helloworld> | ||||||
Component: | ui | Assignee: | AOO issues mailing list <issues> | ||||||
Status: | REOPENED --- | QA Contact: | |||||||
Severity: | Trivial | ||||||||
Priority: | P4 | CC: | issues | ||||||
Version: | OOo 1.1 | Keywords: | oooqa | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||
Hardware: | PC | ||||||||
OS: | Windows XP | ||||||||
Issue Type: | DEFECT | Latest Confirmation in: | --- | ||||||
Developer Difficulty: | --- | ||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
hello_world
2004-01-16 01:07:35 UTC
Created attachment 12511 [details]
stupid little example
Created attachment 12512 [details]
Screenshot, just in case you can't reproduce this
MRU->TL: odd... this only happens when using Math as OLE object. When creating this in a Math stand-alone, the bracket spreads over the whole expression. so this is distinct of issue 23134 ? No, sorry for wasting your time :( reopen issue - You don't have to apologize.. I was asking the developers.. issue 23134 doesn't mention OLE as the main cause - I just want to make sure that this bug is fixed with the changes made for issue 23134 or if this is another problem. (win98 doesn't show the problem in 23134 - but shouldn't it be the same on all windows-Platform if this is a OLE problem?) If this is fixed along with issue 23134 then (developer) please close this one as duplicate. Thank you. MRU->TL: the original problem has been adressed (i get the same result as on the User's screenshot with SRX645; but not with src680 as you can see from issue 23134). But there seems to be something wrong in src680m20m, where a wrong size seems to be used in Math-OLE-Mode (as seen on my XP-machine). according to the announcement on releases (http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=releases&msgNo=7503) this issue will be re-targeted to OOo Later. *** Issue 38711 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** |