Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Full Text Issue Listing |
Summary: | implement styles preview in the Stylist | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Writer | Reporter: | simonbr |
Component: | code | Assignee: | bettina.haberer |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | issues@sw <issues> |
Severity: | Trivial | ||
Priority: | P4 | CC: | issues, mantas |
Version: | OOo 1.1.1 | Keywords: | oooqa |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Issue Type: | ENHANCEMENT | Latest Confirmation in: | --- |
Developer Difficulty: | --- |
Description
simonbr
2004-05-05 21:46:14 UTC
MRU->ES: AFAIK this is part of the "Assigning styles" Q-PCD, ain't it? Indeed. See http://specs.openoffice.org/writer/formatting/Assigning_Styles_in_Writer.sxw (point 7) *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 20876 *** closed It seems, that in http://specs.openoffice.org/writer/formatting/Assigning_Styles_in_Writer.sxw point 7 is only about "WYSIWYG preview in Paragraph Styles control in object bar", but this bug is about "Implement a preview of styles in the stylist", not in object bar. So we should improve http://specs.openoffice.org/writer/formatting/Assigning_Styles_in_Writer.sxw or reopen this bug. reopen issue for the following reasons: * Stylist view not mentioned in the spec (like mantas already noticed) * Preview mode in object bar is a "Future Task", so it's not covered by the spec -> target OOo later so please dispatch or keep this issue as the referece for the "future task". (I don't know whether I'd like to have WYSIWYG in the stylist myself, but OTOH I never had WYSIWYG in the Stylist ;-) (I may have been wrong with the assumption that the preview in the object bar is "not covered" by the spec, but since the stylist is another story and given that the preview won't be implemented with the other changes...) Reassigned to Bettina. Changed summary Hi *, I mark this one as duplicate of issue 28936 because this one has less votes than the other and (more important) - issue 28936 has a mockup on how this should/could look like. *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 28936 *** closing duplicate. |