Issue 29858

Summary: number+dot breaks TOC hyperlink
Product: Writer Reporter: briza <marek.brezina>
Component: codeAssignee: AOO issues mailing list <issues>
Status: CONFIRMED --- QA Contact:
Severity: Trivial    
Priority: P3 CC: issues, rainerbielefeld_ooo_qa
Version: OOo 1.1.1Keywords: oooqa
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Issue Type: DEFECT Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---
Attachments:
Description Flags
Wrong hyperlinks in index none

Description briza 2004-06-04 07:44:12 UTC 
Create a document. Create some chapter and headings and number them by hand, not
with numbering style. Create an index with hyperlinks. Click on heading 1.
chapter. You will be sent to 1.1 chapter. Click on 1.2 chapter and you will be
navigated to 1.2.1.2. This doesnt happen when you number headings with numbering
style, only by hand.
Comment 1 briza 2004-06-04 07:49:57 UTC 
Created attachment 15671 [details]
Wrong hyperlinks in index
Comment 2 michael.ruess 2004-06-04 10:16:18 UTC 
reassigned to ES.
Comment 3 eric.savary 2004-06-09 23:48:56 UTC 
ES->OS: it seems like when a outline heading starts with the combination
<number><dot> (not a real numbering, just plain text), the TOC hyperlink does
not work properly
Comment 4 eric.savary 2004-06-24 00:53:53 UTC 
Reassigned to OS
Comment 5 aehrlich 2004-12-22 07:27:32 UTC 
Hyperlinks go wrong with any non-autonumbered headings!
Comment 6 trelony 2004-12-23 17:07:05 UTC 
I concur - hiperlinks with non-numerical header numbers (for example, 1.A, 1.B,
etc.) do not work.
Comment 7 trelony 2004-12-23 17:22:37 UTC 
It is actually more complex. Original document was imported from Word and it had
"1.A." style numbering (with a dot at the end). After I changed the numbering
schema to numbers links index links started to work. Then I changed the
numbering schema to match old document (but without dot at the end) and links
were still working. I guess Word import did not go well or a number at the end
broke something.
Comment 8 eric.savary 2005-06-20 11:21:58 UTC 
*** Issue 50956 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 9 eric.savary 2006-06-06 13:20:37 UTC 
*** Issue 66113 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 10 eric.savary 2006-08-17 17:23:30 UTC 
*** Issue 68702 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 11 eric.savary 2006-08-24 17:40:31 UTC 
Renamed summary
Comment 12 eric.savary 2006-08-24 17:40:49 UTC 
*** Issue 68927 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 13 eric.savary 2006-10-23 07:52:11 UTC 
*** Issue 70705 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 14 eric.savary 2007-08-28 13:05:20 UTC 
*** Issue 81008 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 15 eric.savary 2008-02-01 19:45:03 UTC 
*** Issue 84278 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 16 mibraun 2008-02-04 23:01:41 UTC 
I just like to mention that automatic numbering does not as flexible as manual
numbering , e.g. if one uses an odm to join multiple single parts into a hole
while the parts do already know their numbering (e.g. used at university.)
Comment 17 helenrussian 2008-03-06 20:01:15 UTC 
*** Issue 86777 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 18 eric.savary 2008-12-02 11:45:25 UTC 
*** Issue 59631 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 19 eric.savary 2008-12-22 23:25:17 UTC 
*** Issue 97521 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 20 Marcus 2017-05-20 11:22:05 UTC 
Reset assigne to the default "issues@openoffice.apache.org".