Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Full Text Issue Listing |
Summary: | Add the possibility of putting a formula object along the text in a text box | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Impress | Reporter: | pratesi <public> |
Component: | code | Assignee: | AOO issues mailing list <issues> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | Trivial | ||
Priority: | P3 | CC: | elish, issues |
Version: | OOo 1.1.2 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Issue Type: | FEATURE | Latest Confirmation in: | --- |
Developer Difficulty: | --- |
Description
pratesi
2004-06-08 18:32:26 UTC
Reassigned to Bettina. I think this issue is a duplicate of issue 22309. It should be possible to insert an equation anywhere in a line (not just at the end) and have it behave like a very wide symbol, e.g., if text is inserted to the left of the equation, the equation should automatically shift to the right, and any text to the right of it should also shift, wrapping to the next line if necessary. When an equation is inserted into a presentation slide, the reasonable default behavior is that of an inline object, although it makes sense to also allow users to create floating equations. I'd also like to see automatic numbering of equations. Although it would require minimal effort to convert PowerPoint into something that meets the needs of scientists, mathematicians, and engineers, Microsoft has never had the slightest interest in doing this. There is no need for OOo to adopt the same attitude. In fact, improved support for mathematics in presentations would be an excellent way for OOo to distinguish itself from the Evil Empire. Dr. Phillip M. Feldman Hello, Could a maintainer mark this issue as a duplicate of issue 22309 ? Of course this won't give a solution to the issue (which is now 6 years old...) but at least it will clarify the situation. To grep the issues easier via "requirements" I put the issues currently lying on my owner to the owner "requirements". Duplicate per comment 2 *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 22309 *** |