Issue 4173

Summary: Word frame's default wrapping is optimal wrap with a value of 1 inch
Product: Writer Reporter: caolanm
Component: codeAssignee: AOO issues mailing list <issues>
Status: CONFIRMED --- QA Contact:
Severity: Trivial    
Priority: P3 CC: issues
Version: 642Keywords: ms_interoperability
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: PC   
OS: All   
Issue Type: DEFECT Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---
Issue Depends on:    
Issue Blocks: 3737    
Description Flags
example .doc
new example .doc none

Description caolanm 2002-04-22 14:38:24 UTC
Word's frame have some strange wrapping behaviour that we can't do, example
Comment 1 caolanm 2002-04-22 14:38:49 UTC
Created attachment 1421 [details]
example .doc
Comment 2 caolanm 2002-05-31 12:44:17 UTC
Don't really understand this MS behaviour. 
Comment 3 caolanm 2002-10-11 15:17:13 UTC
Default wrapping is really "optimal wrap" for this type of frame, and
the least amount we allow is 2cm, while word allows 1 inch.
Comment 4 caolanm 2002-10-11 15:18:41 UTC
Created attachment 3130 [details]
new example .doc
Comment 5 caolanm 2002-10-11 15:20:31 UTC
cmc->ama: We could import this example .doc correctly if we could set
the optimal wrap distance on a per document basis (compatability
option) to 1 inch instead of the current 2cm.
Comment 6 andreas.martens 2002-10-14 09:16:23 UTC
Ok, we could improve the import if we make the "optimal" distance
choosable. We need a user interface, load&save etc. :-(
Comment 7 andreas.martens 2003-09-04 12:04:42 UTC
Another frame postioning..
Comment 8 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann 2003-09-05 11:41:17 UTC
OD (05.09.2003): accepted.
Comment 9 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann 2003-09-29 10:00:04 UTC
Comment 10 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann 2004-03-24 09:07:48 UTC
OD->PB (2004-03-24):
Please take over responsibility.
Comment 11 pb 2004-03-26 08:40:27 UTC
At first, I will write a specification.
This task is part of a group of tasks (i4173 + i13832 + i24135 + 108724 + 110375).
The implementation will be done by Frank (fme).
Comment 12 pb 2004-04-20 08:02:24 UTC
PB -> FME (2004-04-20):
Please take over for implementation. Thx.
Comment 13 stefan.baltzer 2004-04-27 10:42:07 UTC
SBA->FME: As discussed, this must be regarded as a FEATURE from development view
(-> type changed) Sadly, it does not fit the plans for OOo 2.0. Target set to
"OOo later".