Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Full Text Issue Listing
|Summary:||Expand shortcut possibilities (Use of <Alt> key is not offered)|
|Product:||General||Reporter:||Matthias Basler <openoffice>|
|Status:||CLOSED FIXED||QA Contact:||issues@framework <issues>|
|Priority:||P4||CC:||cno, erikanderson3, grahamperrin, issues, josef.latt, kaplanlior, lohmaier, Mathias_Bauer, rb.henschel, simon, tal, www.openoffice.org, yoshimit|
|Target Milestone:||OOo 3.2|
|Issue Type:||ENHANCEMENT||Latest Confirmation in:||---|
|Issue Depends on:||28016|
Description Matthias Basler 2002-05-11 20:59:56 UTC
Please make it possible to use (nearly) all shortcut possibilities that a keyboard offers, as for example: a) Shortcuts using the "Alt" key , as f.e. Alt+"g" or Alt+Shift+"g" b) More Shortcuts using symbols like f.e. Strg+Shift+"-" or +"." or +"#" c) Allow Shortcuts with language-specitic characters for foreign keyboards, as for example Strg+"Ö" or Alt+Shift+"å" Nevertheless the possibilities of OOo 1.0 for customization are already quite impressive.
Comment 1 Joost Andrae 2002-05-13 15:05:44 UTC
Joost->Matthias: ...please think about....most of the shortcuts you mention are often used and their use is mostly restricted by window managers.
Comment 2 stefan.baltzer 2003-02-11 16:21:45 UTC
SBA: ... restricted by various window managers of various operating systems. The outcome would be that a window manager would "catch" the keyboard input and the office has no chance to react at all. There are already some "Standard" shortcuts that don't work on all window managers. But in general, the current (OO.org 6744) limitation looks a little poor: In the dialog, only the 4 Options "Key alone" or "Key plus Shift / Control / Shift+Control" are offered. Reassigned to Bettina.
Comment 3 andreschnabel 2003-07-05 16:14:22 UTC
*** Issue 3207 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 4 lohmaier 2003-09-14 21:17:27 UTC
*** Issue 18886 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 5 lohmaier 2003-12-27 23:59:19 UTC
*** Issue 23861 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 6 lohmaier 2004-08-12 19:15:27 UTC
*** Issue 32905 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 7 lohmaier 2005-01-19 22:30:35 UTC
*** Issue 40286 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 8 jayze 2005-07-19 16:34:26 UTC
It would also be great to have shortcuts for subscript and superscript. I know you can customize this but in the version I am using (1.1.4) there is no keyboad command for Cntrl + = although there is one for Cntrl + + (presumably one has to enter Cntrl + Shift + =). In MS Word, Cntrl + = renders characters in subscript whereas Cntrl + + (or Cntrl + Shift + =) would render characters in superscript.
Comment 9 lohmaier 2005-09-19 22:41:21 UTC
*** Issue 18648 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 10 lohmaier 2005-09-20 20:00:32 UTC
*** Issue 54854 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 11 burg1 2005-11-01 13:12:20 UTC
Additional requests: d) differentiate between the num-pad and the rest of the keyboard. Example: In M$ Word Ctrl+- gives you a conditional hyphen, whereas Ctrl+NUM- gives you a long dash. In OOo 2.0 they both do the same (conditional hyphen), because they are treated as the same shortcut. e) (as suggested on other issues before) drop the system of selecting a new shortcut from a predefined list. Instead, let the users press the actual shortcut themselves (and have OOo read it from the keyboard), as in M$ Word.
Comment 12 pesala 2005-11-01 17:02:20 UTC
You can already press a shortcut key, but first you have to give focus to the shortcut keys field. This saves a lot of pointless scrolling searching for the right shortcut.
Comment 13 burg1 2005-11-01 17:24:02 UTC
@pesala: I know. But I can't assign a shortcut to, say, Ctrl+Shift+- because it's not in the list. Or Ctrl+^ or Ctrl+, or Ctrl+# etc.,etc.,....
Comment 14 lohmaier 2005-11-20 01:46:29 UTC
*** Issue 58138 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 15 lohmaier 2006-07-29 15:16:33 UTC
*** Issue 67697 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 16 rollom 2006-08-29 10:33:54 UTC
The missing possibility to use the Alt key for shortcuts is IMHO one of the big shortcomings of OOo and above all one main reason why OOo cannot be be used easily as an MS Office replacement. People who have to use Word and OOo Writer in coexistence want to use the same key shortcuts for both applications and want therefore to customise OOo to use the well-established word shortcuts. It is a hassle always having to switch between different key sets if you switch applications. Word makes heavy use of the Alt key, for instance when selecting heading levels. The popularity of the AltKeyHandler Macro (even though this software is a hassle to install - impossible for non-nerds... - and use - because it is not integrated in the normal ui functions for keyboard assignments and furthermore often fails to function correctly) and the frequency of questions regarding this issue in discussion groups clearly shows that this issue MUST FINALLY BE SOLVED. The fact that under some OSs the Alt key seems to be unusable for applications (Linux?) cannot be accepted as a reason not to support this key in other OS versions of OOo. When will you finally act?
Comment 17 talcohen 2006-08-29 11:08:06 UTC
In addition to rollom's comment: solving this issue will also enable OOo to have a Word compatibility mode. Such a compatibility mode can greatly help OOo's acceptance, esp. in corporate settings (where re-training employees is a major issue). Remember that Word itself owes a large part of its success to its WordPerfect compatibility mode (still available, at least partially, even in Word 2003).
Comment 18 Mathias_Bauer 2006-12-07 13:25:16 UTC
changing component to "framework".
Comment 19 tommy27 2008-04-05 16:45:26 UTC
i think that would be very nice to have more hotkeys. you got my vote.
Comment 20 brenbarn 2008-08-26 20:44:11 UTC
This is a ridiculous limitation. Every key combination should be assignable.
Comment 21 zordrack 2008-11-07 10:36:01 UTC
...IMHO, what OOo really lacks is the ability to create custom key combinations, like M$ office has. For example, in M$ office one can set some functions to Ctrl+] or Ctrl+[, in OOo that's impossible. In M$ office you can even enter something exotic like Crtl+Alt+Shift+NumPad5 as hotkey for some action, and that will work. This is not something critical, but it would be great if such functionality would be implemented...
Comment 22 Graham Perrin 2008-11-13 14:41:10 UTC
See also Issue 96184 where (on Mac OS X) alt-shift-left alt-shift-right alt-shift-up alt-shift-down _MUST NOT_ manipulate tables.
Comment 23 stefan.baltzer 2008-11-14 10:36:14 UTC
SBA: I regard the initial problem (i.e. >Alt> not working as solved in OOo 3.0. Having this old issue open makes no sense. Set to "Worksforme".
Comment 24 stefan.baltzer 2008-11-14 10:41:30 UTC
Remove block link to issue 4579. THAT one is about special characters, THIS one was more general about <Alt> key. Closed.
Comment 25 stefan.baltzer 2008-11-14 11:46:03 UTC
SBA: Sorry, wrong issue solution. Reopened.
Comment 26 stefan.baltzer 2008-11-14 12:06:59 UTC
Adjusting summary. It is about the <Alt> key and that should be visible. I spoke to PL. <Alt> combinations are possible to implement, but the OpenOffice.org worls must be regarded as "Works on all platforms". Being reduced to Windows and serving people looking for a free-to-use MS Office clone would have meant that this issue would have been adressed long time ago. But OOo is NOT a Windows-only free MS Office clone! As said before, given the variety of opereating systems and window managers OOo did, does and will run on (Welcome, Mac OS X, by the way), THAT many are already used in total that it makes no sense to have OOo shortcuts that use <Alt>. They would have to be altered for every system. Anyone willing to document the existing options and limitations (taking ALL platforms and window manager versions into account!!!) after having dropped the "Windows only MS Office clone" idea)? To me, it looks like "implementing the <Alt> key" would serve only the "one platform only" user to spread his personal adjustments. On the next system, half of them would lead to unexpected results. Reassigned to requirements. I am undecided to close the issue as wontfix. But I set it to wontfix as this is the current opinion among those who contribute developer ressources here.
Comment 27 stefan.baltzer 2008-11-14 12:09:32 UTC
Set to "wontfix".
Comment 28 reader4 2008-11-14 14:49:38 UTC
What a disappointment. I use OOo on Windows and Linux and have been waiting for this option for years. We're not asking for the <Alt> keys to be pre-assigned or anythying, just for the option to include any key combination. I would invite you to write a technical article using a large portion of the Greek alphabet plus some mathematical operators, etc. without the option of hotkey combinations for each symbol and decide whether this issue is important. <Alt>+a puts in an "alpha" much easier that reaching for the mouse, moving over "Insert > Special Character > selecting "Times" > selecting "Basic greek" > clicking on "alpha" and closing the window... or remembering all of the key codes and trying that route... Let's not forget that Ctrl+Shift, Super+Ctrl, Super+Shift, Super+Ctrl+shift etc. also can have bindings in the window manager. At least the MW let's me select anything I want as a combination! Not giving the option doesn't help - it's just leaves us who are willing to sort out the WM and OOo key bindings out in the cold.
Comment 29 tommy27 2008-11-14 15:03:58 UTC
i'm disappoint too about the "WONTFIX" decision. :-( people who do not need Alt+soemthing hotkey could easily leave those unassigned. on the otehr hand, people who needed that hotkeys should be able to choose it.
Comment 30 Regina Henschel 2008-11-14 15:21:34 UTC
OOo can use ALT key already, but you have to edit the configuration file directly. This issue is not about the question whether OOo should use ALT-key but it is about giving the user an UI to assign such shortcuts easier. Of cause there are some OS which use some of the possible short cuts. But that is no problem. We do not ask to use such short cuts as default in every OOo version. But if a Windows wants to use ALT key, do not force him to edit configuration file. If such a Windows user configures his keyboard, this will not hurt any other user. Besides I think, it is not a good way, to set an issue wich such a lot of votes an duplicates to "wontfix" without discussing this on email@example.com.
Comment 31 mike_hall 2008-11-14 15:47:32 UTC
I can see no possible reason why this option should not be adopted. Flexibility is usually the hallmark of OpenOffice and is better encouraged than opposed.
Comment 32 burg1 2008-11-14 16:06:28 UTC
@sba: Sorry, but your argument is completely stupid! 1) What does the Alt-key have to do with the operating system or platform? Anybody can get an industry-standard keyboard that features an Alt-key! 2) If platform-compatibility is the only thing you care about, then I suggest to remove the colors from all icons *immediately*, since some platforms might only support monochrome displays. Bottom line: Enabling Alt-key-shortcuts improves the lives of (at least) 95% of all users, and doesn't do any harm to the rest. We've been waiting for this feature for more than 6 years now!!
Comment 33 tommy27 2008-11-14 16:46:19 UTC
@regina could u please teach me how to edit the ini file to enable Alt+key hotkeys? @sba i respectfully ask you to reconsider your decision about this issue.
Comment 34 mbayer 2008-11-14 17:03:26 UTC
I totally agree with regina. Besides everything, a statement like "I set it to wontfix as this is the current opinion among those who contribute developer ressources here" is unacceptable. What also is not acceptable is introducing new keyboard shortcuts with Alt (Ctrl+Alt+N for notes in OOo3) on the one hand, but keeping users from configuring that very shortcut via the UI on the other hand. If interoperability were a concern, there shouldn't be hard coded shortcuts with Alt in the first place. Note that there was or there is issue 32 (!), and issue 6342 which more or less target on the same thing like this one here.
Comment 35 Regina Henschel 2008-11-14 17:06:52 UTC
@tommy27 You find a German description on http://www.ooowiki.de/TastaturAnpassen, part 2.2 "Händisches Bearbeiten der Konfiguration". If you need a translation to English please contact me directly, I'll try to help.
Comment 36 tommy27 2008-11-14 17:19:33 UTC
@regina sorry, i don't understand german. i think an english translation would be of interest for everybody round here. @other users please don't be harsh with sba. i don't share his point of view about this issue but i think we should not offend him. let's keep the discussion on a civilized level
Comment 37 erikanderson3 2008-11-14 17:41:54 UTC
@tommy27, @everyone: Hear, hear! While I feel it is important on the one hand that sba and the other OOo devs understand how their behaviour is coming across (apparently negatively enough to quite anger some people following this thread), I feel it is equally important that we keep this discourse civil. So for anyone else possibly frustrated with how things are happening, please express yourself politely. One can make a forceful point without including inflammatory language -- and, in fact, any point will be all the more forceful if it is well received. It is worth noting that insults and flaming generally aren't. Cheers, -- Erik Anderson
Comment 38 Graham Perrin 2008-11-14 18:37:25 UTC
For stirring such debate/contention, I am partly to blame. Whilst no-one has requested from me an apology, I do feel that I should offer one. Sorry! Clearly, this is an emotive subject. I assume that discussions will continue in irc://irc.freenode.net/#ooo_macport and in other channels. Re http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/MacOSXPortMeetings I see a meeting, which will be logged, scheduled for Wednesday 26th November. I will aim to be present in IRC for that meeting. Before the 26th: it should be good to gain … if not consensus, then at least *clarity of options*. For now, quoting from another ticket: > A quiet period of maybe twenty-four hours or more may be helpful. Respect, and peace, Graham
Comment 39 cno 2008-11-14 19:11:38 UTC
I read many comments. Already a positive one on sba's question ? ( "Anyone willing to document the existing options and limitations (taking ALL platforms and window manager versions into account!!!) after having dropped the "Windows only MS Office clone" idea)? " ) I offer to help with WinXP and Gnome on Linux. But I don't mind to do only one. Those interested may contact me directly, if they so wish. Ciao, Cor
Comment 40 Regina Henschel 2008-11-14 22:52:50 UTC
@tommy72 I have written an English guide and put it temporarily on http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/User:Regina/MyDrafts#Customize_Keyboard
Comment 41 tommy27 2008-11-15 02:36:29 UTC
Comment 42 tommy27 2008-11-15 08:23:06 UTC
issue has been reopened. thnak you sba for your understanding.
Comment 43 Graham Perrin 2008-11-15 14:03:11 UTC
@ regina: thanks, http://www.diigo.com/annotated/00b38c25e61547ab61dd4d0f791a073e for an annotated view of your wiki page.
Comment 44 Graham Perrin 2008-11-15 14:15:27 UTC
See also Issue 96235 > Tools menu | Customize… | option to customise Keyboard is > missing if Tools menu is called whilst Start Centre is present
Comment 45 Matthias Basler 2008-11-16 13:10:43 UTC
Being the original reporter I feel like I should respond to the recent comments as well: 1. Please read my first comment. The Alt key combinations were just one out of three examples, so please don't reduce the issue to just the "Alt+..." part. 2. tommy27 wrote > people who do not need Alt+soemthing hotkey could easily leave those unassigned. Exactly. Nobody would be hurt. I might add that probably most users only work with OOo under one OS only and therefore wouldn't even notice that the shortcut possibilities might be different on different OS. 3. The discussion whether OOo is a M$ Office clone or not seems totally irrelevant to me. Given that most OOo users are Windows users, offering a Windows-only solution would still make sense imho. Even offering features only available on Mac OS and/or Linux can make sense. There is imho no problem with OS specific features in OOo as long as they are documented for the user. Besides a lot of features in OOo are used only by a minority of people, and compared to them the features suggested in this issue have (quite obviously) a LOT of potential users.
Comment 46 tommy27 2008-11-16 15:55:47 UTC
100% agree with matthiasbasler
Comment 47 erikanderson3 2008-11-16 23:36:08 UTC
Ditto Matthias's comment. And I point folks also to burg1's comment: (as suggested on other issues before) drop the system of selecting a new shortcut from a predefined list. Instead, let the users press the actual shortcut themselves (and have OOo read it from the keyboard), as in M$ Word. Some of sba's (and the other devs'?) concern seems to be with predefined OOo shortcuts that might have to be different on different OSes. While I see no problem with that in principle (users of multiple OSes generally understand that key bindings are perforce different on the different platforms), I also think burg1's suggestion also has a lot of merit -- user-defined shortcut possibilities should not be constrained to a predefined list of key options. Matthias's original posting likewise suggests this: c) Allow Shortcuts with language-specitic characters for foreign keyboards, as for example Strg+"Ö" or Alt+Shift+"å" Basically, if the user has any particular key on the keyboard, they should be able to use that for any user-defined keyboard shortcut -- be that "å" or Alt or Apple or Hyper, or what have you. Concerns about window managers grabbing the keypress instead of OOo should be addressed not by limiting OOo options, but rather by: 1) OOo querying the WM and notifying the user if a certain combo is unavailable (ideal, but much more complicated) or 2) simply warning the user in the keyboard shortcut definition dialog that the WM might already have certain key combos defined, such that certain OOo keyboard shortcut possibilities might not work. Restricting OOo shortcut options, though simpler to develop, does not strike me as a particularly user-friendly approach. Just my $0.02. Cheers, -- Erik Anderson
Comment 48 Graham Perrin 2008-11-17 09:06:28 UTC
> Opened: Sat May 11 19:59:00 +0000 2002 > ------- Additional comments from matthiasbasler > Sun Nov 16 13:10:43 +0000 2008 ------- > Being the original reporter I feel like I should respond to the > recent comments as well: Thanks to matthiasbasler for following this issue with such great patience. > just one out of three examples, so please don't reduce the issue to > just the "Alt+..." part. +1 to that plea. > 2. tommy27 wrote > >> people who do not need Alt+soemthing hotkey could easily leave >> those unassigned. > > Exactly. Nobody would be hurt. +1 > I might add that probably most users only work with OOo under one OS > only and therefore wouldn't even notice that the shortcut > possibilities might be different on different OS. +1 On this point: by coincidence at the weekend I took an unbiased colleague from Plone community with me to irc://irc.freenode.net/#dev.openoffice.org and quizzed him for responses to scenarios in which shortcut keys might not behave as expected if ever he found himself using OOo on a platform other than his preferred Linux. From this person: there were no cries of displeasure, which (to me) supports the multi-platform *user* observation made by matthiasbasler. However: focusing on the multi-platform *application* there is a critical observation: >> tables being wrecked in OOo -- and with such wreckage in mind (without any argument over recent points in this issue 4756, and without detracting votes from this issue) I refer readers to issue 96184 where -- on Mac OS X -- certain shortcuts historically associated with tables _MUST NOT_ manipulate tables. With all due respect I suggest that developers should visualise some balance between: a) the time and effort required to generally improve the keyboard-related _options_ in OOo _without regard to platform_ b) the time and effort required to more urgently address _conflicts_ in which a traditional shortcut on a particular platform is found to have a confusing or (worse) destructive effect on another platform. Issue 96184 is just one example of a destructive issue. As use of OOo 3 spreads (we should welcome this spread) so I suspect that other destructive issues may be found. Already, as Erik draws attention to the quoted text concerning accented characters, I realise that I _always_ use alt key combined with _a wide variety of letters on the keyboard_ to produce é è and _a wide variety of other on-screen characters_ that are not keyboard-standard in my locale. Such conflicts may prove to be non-destructive (I have not experimented, I should do) but in any case we should: i) be prepared for further reports of such conflicts (I should not be surprised to discover current and future tickets that Bugzilla organisers may wish to treat as duplicates of this one) and ii) be prepared to deal gracefully with complaints -- respect each other's wishes and requirements. > ------- Additional comments from erikanderson3 > Sun Nov 16 23:36:08 +0000 2008 ------- > Restricting OOo shortcut options, though simpler to develop, does > not strike me as a particularly user-friendly approach. Just my > $0.02. -- and in issue 96184 -- where a very common shortcut that's intended for system-wide simple selection of words is found to have destructive effect in OOo -- even when I aim to manipulate OOo configuration files at file system level, I find no way of removing the offending shortcut. (I assume that OOo mod2 is 'alt' on Mac as OOo mod2 is 'alt' on other platforms, yes?) Incidentally, I did wonder whether 'destructive' is too strong a word but all things considered I think it is fair. For someone like me who copy types and uses the tab key and other keys within tables _without looking at the screen_, it is truly destructive to find (when one does look at the screen) that OOo has wrecked a previously good table. There are undo commands, true, but it feels very bad. Just my twopenneth. To close my comment, with a focus on the summary lines of issues > Expand shortcut possibilities (Use of <Alt> key is not offered) -- this issue 4756 may be related to expansion of OOo _options_ -- my issue 96184 involves _conflicts_ without options, for which workarounds (if any) may be terribly obscure.
Comment 49 mbayer 2008-11-17 11:15:52 UTC
While I appreciate this issue arouses the interest of the community, I would like to remind my fellow users of OOo that holding discussions in issues is not very productive. Instead, join the firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list, please.
Comment 50 Graham Perrin 2008-11-18 11:50:48 UTC
@ mbayer: thanks, and apologies. In some other trackers discussion is encouraged but I see that in OOo it rapidly makes tickets difficult to follow. I find http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/HowTo_Join_the_User_Experience_Community and have completed step one of five.
Comment 51 tommy27 2008-11-24 12:08:54 UTC
a question to sba and OOo developers. is this enhancement (allow more hotkeys combinations) difficult to implement? as regina said it's already possible to to it by editing the configuration file directly. unfortunately this method it's not very user friendly. it seems to me that if an expert user can do it manually, it should not be that hard for developers to implement this enhancement in the GUI.
Comment 52 Mathias_Bauer 2008-12-26 20:51:21 UTC
Sorry, but isn't this issue a duplicate to issue 6342 (or vice versa ;-)) ? Nevertheless, without going into all the details of the long discussion here: of course the request to be able to use ALT for *custom* shortcuts is absolutely valid. Moreover, we already use ALT for *preconfigured* shortcuts already, so I can't see any reason not to support that in the configuration dialog. The effort for this feature isn't extraordinarily, but it's also not low. A rough estimation: 2-3 weeks development time plus QA.
Comment 53 tommy27 2008-12-27 08:34:27 UTC
well, if 2-3 weeks are needed i think it could be done for OOo 3.1 which is planned to be released at the end of March. user waited so long for this isses which is one of the oldest here but a target milestone has not been decided yet.
Comment 54 cno 2008-12-27 08:54:15 UTC
@ Tommy27, Hi Tomy, You write "i think it could be done for OOo 3.1" When you talk about your own agenda, you might be right ... only you just missed the feature freeze date. Pls see. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OOoRelease31 Sorry, but an excellent product needs good planing and testing. Cor
Comment 55 tommy27 2008-12-27 09:02:24 UTC
u r right. so, let's do it for 3.2 :-)
Comment 56 Graham Perrin 2009-01-25 19:59:39 UTC
Discussion at http://n2.nabble.com/-tt2214450.html rephrases what was explicit in issue 93749 (implicit in issue 96184): > Impossible to select words using the keyboard in OOo 3 for Mac OS X
Comment 57 Graham Perrin 2009-01-26 06:50:51 UTC
Created attachment 59657 [details] ~/Library/Application\ Support/OpenOffice.org/3/user/config/soffice.cfg/modules/swriter/accelerator/en-US/current.xml
Comment 58 Graham Perrin 2009-01-26 06:52:11 UTC
Created attachment 59658 [details] ~/Library/Application\ Support/OpenOffice.org/3/user/config/soffice.cfg/modules/swriter/accelerator/en-US/current.xml
Comment 59 Graham Perrin 2009-01-26 07:21:00 UTC
Apple Human Interface Guidelines: The Keyboard <http://developer.apple.com/documentation/userexperience/Conceptual/AppleHIGuidelines/XHIGUser Input/chapter_12_section_3.html> Apple Human Interface Guidelines: The Keyboard: Extending Text Selection With the Shift and Arrow Keys <http://developer.apple.com/documentation/userexperience/Conceptual/AppleHIGuidelines/XHIGUser Input/chapter_12_section_3.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP30000361-TPXREF17> Apple Human Interface Guidelines: Keyboard Shortcuts Quick Reference <http://developer.apple.com/documentation/userexperience/Conceptual/AppleHIGuidelines/XHIGKey boardShortcuts/chapter_950_section_1.html> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/How_Tos/Edit_Keyboard_Configuration_File (not tested on Mac) thanks to Regina. Re issue 93749: four lines that must be corrected for Apple HIG for The Keyboard are probably at <http://www.openoffice.org/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/59658/current.xml> lines 68 69 95 96 In HIG <http://tinyurl.com/apple-hig-ooo-93749> the four corresponding statements are: > Shift–Option–Right Arrow > To the end of the current word, > then to the end of the next word > Shift–Option–Left Arrow > To the beginning of the current word, > then to the beginning of the previous word > Shift–Option–Up Arrow > To the beginning of the current paragraph, > then to the beginning of the next paragraph > Shift–Option–Down Arrow > To the end of the current paragraph, > then to the end of the next paragraph > (include the blank line between paragraphs in > cut, copy, and paste operations) --- Re issue 96184: sorry, I can not find the conflicting lines that must be corrected, but I will keep looking. The summary line there reminds us that the four key combinations > MUST NOT manipulate tables I guess that I must identify the keyboard configuration file that relates to edition of tables.
Comment 60 Graham Perrin 2009-01-26 07:26:00 UTC
Sorry, I forgot that Bugzilla breaks long URLs. Here are the tinyurl equivalents: Apple Human Interface Guidelines: The Keyboard <http://tinyurl.com/apple-hig-the-keyboard> <http://developer.apple.com/documentation/userexperience/Conceptual/AppleHIGuidelines/XHIGUser Input/chapter_12_section_3.html> Apple Human Interface Guidelines: The Keyboard: Extending Text Selection With the Shift and Arrow Keys <http://tinyurl.com/apple-hig-ooo-93749> <http://developer.apple.com/documentation/userexperience/Conceptual/AppleHIGuidelines/XHIGUser Input/chapter_12_section_3.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP30000361-TPXREF17> Apple Human Interface Guidelines: Keyboard Shortcuts Quick Reference <http://tinyurl.com/apple-hig-keyboard-shortcuts> <http://developer.apple.com/documentation/userexperience/Conceptual/AppleHIGuidelines/XHIGKey boardShortcuts/chapter_950_section_1.html>
Comment 61 Graham Perrin 2009-01-26 07:42:03 UTC
Created attachment 59659 [details] grep -R "accel:mod2" ~/Library/Application\ Support/OpenOffice.org/3/user
Comment 62 Graham Perrin 2009-01-26 08:14:33 UTC
Created attachment 59660 [details] sudo grep -R "accel:mod2" /Applications/OpenOffice.org.app
Comment 63 Graham Perrin 2009-01-26 17:27:19 UTC
Please ignore all 25th/26th January comments/attachments from me. Terribly sorry. Confusion with duplicates. I completely lost sight of issue 92224. Thanks to Regina for off-ticket steering me.
Comment 64 tommy27 2009-02-14 17:33:19 UTC
i think that after almost 9 years this issue deserve to be fixed. please consider it for OOo 3.2 which is planned for september 2009 http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OOoRelease32
Comment 65 mbayer 2009-02-14 18:48:13 UTC
Please don't be too optimistic with development goals. If you want this issue to be fixed in one of the next releases of OOo, submit a patch for it, or join the email@example.com mailing list in order to make the UX team recommend this issue for development, please. The UX mailing list is also the right place for all kinds of discussions about this issue.
Comment 66 Mathias_Bauer 2009-02-14 19:47:07 UTC
ALT-Keys are usable for shortcuts since quite some time. It's just the dialog that wasn't changed (because it needed a complete rewrite). As keyboard shortcut configuration in 3.1 is now based on configuration files it should be easier to provide a new shortcut configuration dialog. Perhaps someone is motivated to write an extension?!
Comment 67 cno 2009-02-14 19:52:15 UTC
Just for clarification: ux has important tasks. Recommending issues for development, however, is not one of those.
Comment 68 mbayer 2009-02-14 20:25:47 UTC
@mba: I don't see why this should be left to an extension, since this issue is about making OOo configurable via OOo's GUI. @cornouws: I'm sorry; I somehow must have misunderstood UX's role in the Quarterly Reviews.
Comment 69 tommy27 2009-02-15 06:57:36 UTC
@mba do u think that dialog could be rewritten in time for OOo 3.2? are 7 months from now enough to do it?
Comment 70 cno 2009-02-15 09:04:27 UTC
@mbayer: no problem that you estimated ux@OOo's role higher - better than the other way round, afaiac ;-) @tommy27: code freeze is in about 5.5 months, but for an extension, that does not sound impossible. I didn't have time yet to look at the upcoming 3.1 ... but of course, for time being, people who don't want to wait can edit the configuration files directly as a solution.
Comment 71 tommy27 2009-02-15 09:08:54 UTC
ok, i hope that manual editing ot the shorcut configuration in OOo 3.1 would be a simple think and doens't require NASA engineering skills...
Comment 72 Mathias_Bauer 2009-02-15 13:15:37 UTC
Just enabling the dialog to use "ALT" is easy, but we always thought that we shouldn't leave the users alone with the situation that many configurable shortcuts won't work because the system takes them over. But if it was acceptable to ignore that for now, it would be possible to implement "ALT"-Support soon.
Comment 73 tommy27 2009-02-15 13:27:53 UTC
nice news. i'd be glad to use ALT shortcut at my own risk: u warnned me.
Comment 74 mbayer 2009-02-15 13:58:30 UTC
It is the status quo especially under Linux, that many of OOo's pre-defined keyboard shortcuts cannot be used, because the window manager/ desktop manager "catches" them: just think Ctrl+F1 ... Ctrl+F12 which switches to virtual desktop 1 ... 12, or Ctrl+Tabulator which switches to the next virtual desktop, and so on. But I think this is not a reason against, but *for* making the Alt key available for keyboard shortcuts configuration via the GUI: that way the user has more choices to *avoid* a shortcut is being "catched" by the desktop manager. Currently one is limited to shortcuts without the Alt key. On the other hand, since there are some pre-defined keyboard shortcuts in OOo which use the Alt key (think Ctrl+Alt+Cursor up, or the newly introduced Ctrl+Alt+N), one has to be able to define an other shortcut for these actions (e.g. in case the default is already in use for the desktop manager). Currently one cannot configure these shortcuts at all. Thus, I cannot see why OOo should preclude its users from defining/ undefining/ redefining keyboard shortcuts with the Alt key any longer.
Comment 75 mbayer 2009-02-15 14:11:52 UTC
*** Issue 6342 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 76 Mathias_Bauer 2009-02-15 14:42:05 UTC
I will try to move that forward. This will comprise the change of the dialog and moving existing "hard coded" shortcuts using "ALT" to the configuration files. I will add support for "ALT" and "SHIFT ALT". We could also add "CTRL-ALT" and "CTRL-SHIFT-ALT"... There are a lot of other questions to solve (platform specific issues etc.) but for now let's just solve the first problem with the missing support in the dialog, everything else can be solved later.
Comment 77 Mathias_Bauer 2009-02-15 14:42:38 UTC
assigning to myself
Comment 78 measdale 2009-02-15 14:45:55 UTC
If Alt-key combinations are actually assignable through the config files at present, is this also true for the other combinations in the original request (ie. allowing shortcut combinations for symbols and keyboard-specific characters)? In other packages, I regularly assign Ctrl+"<" and Ctrl+">" which (on some keyboards) are Ctrl+Shift+"," and Ctrl+Shift+"." Or Ctrl+"[" and Ctrl+"]". Or should those be spun off into a separate issue, if the Alt question is resolved?
Comment 79 tommy27 2009-02-15 14:50:26 UTC
mba i appreciate very much that u decide to take care of this issue and that you set target milestone to OOo 3.2. have a good work
Comment 80 Regina Henschel 2009-02-15 15:11:02 UTC
@measdale: Using [ and > and such other keys is already tracked in issue 27081.
Comment 81 Mathias_Bauer 2009-02-15 17:56:13 UTC
Just a comment from my side about how I see the platform problem. VCL defines several keyboard modifiers. Since I can remember we always had MOD1 and MOD2 that e.g. on Windows map to CTRL and ALT. I don't know how many modifiers we support nowadays on the different platforms, but I will find out. In general we can offer access to all keys and modifiers that VCL shows us. To my current knowledge this does not allow us to differentiate between the numeric and the normal keyboard. And I also doubt that the configuration format can do that. I have to find that out. The different platforms will create the following problems: - Some keys are "reserved" on platform X, but not on platform Y. That means that we must not use them for predefined shortcuts (that's true already now!) and we either leave it up to the user to find out if his desired personal shortcut in OOo works on his platform or we can try to assist him. As the latter will be quite some effort, I opt for not doing this, at least now. - a user keyboard shortcut might work on one platform but not on another. This can create a problem in a user profile shared between several platforms. I consider this a very rare case and again would like to leave it up to the user to define shortcuts in a way that they work on all used platforms.
Comment 82 erikanderson3 2009-02-15 18:04:41 UTC
@mba: I strongly recommend that OOo be allowed to use *any* recognizable keycode, beyond just Ctrl, Alt, and Shift. I regularly make use of the Win and Alt-Gr key modifiers, for instance. Concerns about desktop environments or window managers catching the keypresses could be alleviated simply by notifying the user that this might happen. If someone is going so far as to customize their keyboard input, they are very probably already savvy enough to deal with such concerns, provided they have a hint at where to look to change their system settings. Another option for avoiding key combos that the DE or WM catch instead is to have the user input the desired key combo in the dialog -- I believe this is what MS Word already does, and is also what the KDE config dialogs do. If the desired key combo produces a strange effect instead of appearing in the OOo dialog, it's pretty clear that that key combo is being caught. Just my $0.02.
Comment 83 erikanderson3 2009-02-15 19:03:18 UTC
@mba: Looks like we just missed each other. Thank you for explaining about VCL; I assume this is a library that OOo uses? And I agree about leaving it to the user to deal with conflicts, provided that the OOo dialog includes a caveat explaining this. Perhaps something simple like, "WARNING: Some key combinations might be reserved by your operating system."
Comment 84 Mathias_Bauer 2009-03-03 15:37:58 UTC
fixed in cws mba32issues01
Comment 85 rollom 2009-03-03 15:42:39 UTC
NICE! Thanks to all who helped to fix this!
Comment 86 tommy27 2009-03-03 19:55:41 UTC
does this mean is gonna be available in OOo 3.1 or OOo 3.2?
Comment 87 Mathias_Bauer 2009-03-04 06:48:12 UTC
As the "target milestone" is 3.2 ...
Comment 88 tommy27 2009-03-04 07:20:22 UTC
OK, i will patiently wait till September 2009. thanks for fixing it!!!
Comment 89 Mathias_Bauer 2009-04-06 12:02:53 UTC
Just a remark: the configuration dialog will support "no modifier", SHIFT, CTRL, SHIFT-CTRL, ALT, SHIFT-ALT, CTRL-ALT, CTRL-SHIFT-ALT with the following keys: KEY_F1- KEY_F12, KEY_DOWN, KEY_UP, KEY_LEFT, KEY_RIGHT, KEY_HOME, KEY_END, KEY_PAGEUP, KEY_PAGEDOWN, KEY_RETURN, KEY_BACKSPACE, KEY_INSERT, KEY_DELETE The following keys are supported only with at least CTRL or ALT pressed: KEY_0 - KEY_9, KEY_A - KEY_Z, KEY_SPACE, KEY_ADD, KEY_SUBTRACT, KEY_MULTIPLY, KEY_DIVIDE Several complaints have been given that the list of keys should be extended also. While I agree to that I would like to fix that in a second step (unless someone came up with undisputed(!) list now). This will be covered by issue 27081.
Comment 90 pdegrooot 2009-04-09 04:31:14 UTC
Excellent. This was a showstopper for me. I'm a keyboard and macro person and not having these keyboard meant that changing to Writer from Word (which I would like to do) would mean more compromises than I'm willing to make.
Comment 91 Graham Perrin 2009-04-15 13:38:50 UTC
Thanks to developers and all other contributors for progressing this :) For reference: http://download.openoffice.org/next/ http://eis.services.openoffice.org/ http://eis.services.openoffice.org/EIS2/cws.ShowCWS?Path=DEV300%2Fmba32issues01 … and until integration occurs, I'll probably stop thinking about shortcuts (the shortcuts shown in the Customize dialogue are different from the actual shortcuts, but that's a different bug ;)
Comment 92 Graham Perrin 2009-04-15 13:39:54 UTC
Thanks to developers and all other contributors for progressing this :) For reference: http://download.openoffice.org/next/ http://eis.services.openoffice.org/ http://eis.services.openoffice.org/EIS2/cws.ShowCWS?Path=DEV300%2Fmba32issues01 … and until integration occurs, I'll probably have to stop thinking about shortcuts (what's shown in the Customize dialogue contradicts the actual shortcuts, but that'll be a different bug ;)
Comment 93 Mathias_Bauer 2009-04-15 14:12:02 UTC
Can you explain where you see contradictions? Some examples might suffice.
Comment 94 Graham Perrin 2009-04-16 13:32:40 UTC
Issue 101133 … looking at it now, may be a duplicate of this issue 4756.
Comment 95 Mathias_Bauer 2009-04-16 15:23:07 UTC
Shall I upload a build for testing?
Comment 96 Graham Perrin 2009-04-17 02:51:03 UTC
@mba: very kind, thanks, but don't build for me alone; I'm happy to wait for a relevant build to appear at http://download.openoffice.org/next/
Comment 97 Mathias_Bauer 2009-04-17 07:16:56 UTC
O.K., so let's wait with judging about issue 101133 until then.
Comment 98 Mathias_Bauer 2009-04-30 11:55:50 UTC
Hint for QA: the new functionality is described in #desc90. Accessing shortcuts can be done by putting focus into the large listbox and pressing the desired key combination.
Comment 99 b.osi.ooo 2009-04-30 13:21:49 UTC
seen in cws mba32issues01 - verified
Comment 100 tommy27 2009-05-04 15:59:39 UTC
Issue 3.2 has been scheduled for end of november. I've also heard rumors about releasing a 3.1.1 between the incoming 3.1 (march 7th) and future 3.2 Is there any chance we could see the new hotkeys feature in the 3.1.1 instead of the 3.2? waiting till november is very hard...
Comment 101 Mathias_Bauer 2009-05-04 21:22:08 UTC
We don't add new features to "micro" releases, sorry.
Comment 102 tommy27 2009-05-05 16:30:17 UTC
ok, thanks 4 feedback. i'll wait till november '09
Comment 103 b.osi.ooo 2009-05-14 12:24:47 UTC
Integrated into DEV300m48 - closing You may download from: ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/MacOSX/Dev_DEV300_m48/ (Other builds are not yet available public.)
Comment 104 Joe Smith 2009-07-16 15:54:34 UTC
Verifying: I see the new behavior in DEV300_m52 (Linux) under Tools > Customize. I could assign a function to the Alt+G key chord and use it; deleting the custom entry seems ok as well. Nice!
Comment 105 cno 2009-07-19 10:59:02 UTC
works fine on my WinXP with DEV300m52 Thanks!
Comment 106 tommy27 2009-07-30 13:12:55 UTC
nice to see that the new feature has been correctly implemented!!! thanks to the developers!!!
Comment 107 tommy27 2009-07-30 13:26:49 UTC
nice to see that the new feature has been correctly implemented!!! thanks to the developers!!!
Comment 108 Mathias_Bauer 2009-07-30 14:29:26 UTC
Thanks for the flowers. :-)
Comment 109 slowpoison 2009-12-16 20:50:27 UTC
Nice to see that this has been fixed in 3.2. I can't wait for Ubuntu to incorporate that release.
Comment 110 tommy27 2010-05-16 09:48:23 UTC
this issue fix was one of the most useful updates of OOo 3.2. thanks 4 fixin' it