Issue 56252

Summary: Numbering style assigned to an unused paragraph style is not saved
Product: Writer Reporter: kristov <mail>
Component: editingAssignee: michael.ruess
Status: CLOSED FIXED QA Contact: issues@sw <issues>
Severity: Trivial    
Priority: P3 CC: issues
Version: 680m134   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Issue Type: DEFECT Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---
Issue Depends on:    
Issue Blocks: 59997    

Description kristov 2005-10-19 07:41:44 UTC
Problem: If you assign a numbering style to a paragraph style and don't use it
at least once, it is not saved.

How to reproduce [I use the german localization, so some translactions might be
1) Create an empty text document.
2) Assign a numbering style to "Text Body" (e.g. Numbering 2).
3) Save and reload the document.
4) The numbering style of "Text Body" is reset to "None".

If you switched on the numbering for at least one "Text Body" paragraph (even if
you switched it off immediately afterwards), the bug does not occur.

This applies to 2.0RC3.

Note: This might be related to bug #56251.
Comment 1 michael.ruess 2005-10-20 16:11:45 UTC
MRU->OD: as described, a numbering style assigned to an para style which is
currently not used in the document will not be saved, at least it is not
available when reopening the document.
Comment 2 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann 2005-12-07 14:30:41 UTC
OD->AMA: Please take over as discussed.
Comment 3 Mathias_Bauer 2006-01-20 14:32:02 UTC
We will not be able to fix that one until code freeze for 2.0.2 -> retargetted
to 2.0.3
Comment 4 andreas.martens 2006-03-20 15:48:42 UTC
Fixed in CWS swqbf59
Comment 5 andreas.martens 2006-03-20 15:56:02 UTC
*** Issue 54307 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 6 andreas.martens 2006-03-31 13:08:39 UTC
Ready for QA.
Comment 7 michael.ruess 2006-04-03 10:02:57 UTC
Checked fix in CWS swqbf59.
Comment 8 michael.ruess 2006-04-03 10:06:01 UTC
Verified fix in CWS swqbf59.
Comment 9 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann 2006-04-28 09:39:49 UTC
*** Issue 64856 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 10 michael.ruess 2006-05-09 16:22:40 UTC
Checked fix in 680m167.