Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Full Text Issue Listing |
Summary: | Difficult to anchor images to text located in nested tables | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Writer | Reporter: | raindrops <na1000> | ||||
Component: | editing | Assignee: | AOO issues mailing list <issues> | ||||
Status: | CONFIRMED --- | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | Trivial | ||||||
Priority: | P3 | CC: | issues | ||||
Version: | OOo 2.0.1 | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | All | ||||||
Issue Type: | DEFECT | Latest Confirmation in: | --- | ||||
Developer Difficulty: | --- | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
raindrops
2006-01-18 13:13:06 UTC
MRU->raindrops: as a workaround, use the real Drag-and-Drop mechanism. Select a graphic and then click and hold left mousbutton, so that a Drag-and-drop curso will show up after about 2 seconds. Then transfer the graphic into a table cell. Nevertheless, moving a graphic across a table is kind of painful. it is a known problem; see issue 12952. *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 12952 *** Closing duplicate. Like another issue of mine, this too is closed as a duplicate; but I don't see any semblance between the two. I think developers would skip all issues marked "duplicate" and so an important feedback/clue would be lost. As I described, this issue is not about a single table. It is about a NESTED table; and that too when the text is NOT in the fist column of that nested table. Secondly, the issue 12952 does not talk about image jumping back to original location or to a third location. How can this issue be marked as "duplicate" under such circumstances? Let us have a new category called "variant", with the following important differences as compared to a true duplicate: 1. Unlike a duplicate, a variant stays open and get closed together with original. 2. Just in case the root cause is different, the issue can be tackled separately. Currently, as a closed issue, no one will even think about it. It simply drops out of sight. 3. The developer is forced to read a variant separately. Created attachment 33368 [details]
sample document
MRU->OD this is quite similar to issue 12952. The anchor even jumps a bit more uncontrollable when moving in tbales with nested tables inside. Please have a look into the methods if this is really not a dup. Thanks! Raindrops->OD The sample attached by MRU does NOT have the problem of jumping back to a third UNKNOWN location, SEVERAL PAGES AWAY; which my issue is all about. In MRU's sample, the image stays wherever you drop it. You can see the anchor all the time. The movement of the anchor too seems fairly controlled. The only problem is in pushing it in the right direction, which can be mastered with some practice. (Trolleys used in airports/supermarkets come to mind!) ;) But in the problem I am describing, the anchor is truly wild. It does not even appear in the target cell, and when you release the image, it is sure to go to a third unknown page, several pages away. You have to go looking for the missing image, as it is not to be found at its original location. Probably the reason is that MRU's sample is only one page long, and therefore can't show my problem. Probably the distance from original position to the target position also is a factor. I will try this out on my part. Thanks. Reset assigne to the default "issues@openoffice.apache.org". |