Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Full Text Issue Listing |
Summary: | configure: --enable-universal | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | porting | Reporter: | pavel | ||||||
Component: | MacOSX | Assignee: | ericb | ||||||
Status: | CLOSED WONT_FIX | QA Contact: | issues@porting <issues> | ||||||
Severity: | Trivial | ||||||||
Priority: | P3 | CC: | issues, rene | ||||||
Version: | current | ||||||||
Target Milestone: | DevTools | ||||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||||
OS: | All | ||||||||
Issue Type: | ENHANCEMENT | Latest Confirmation in: | --- | ||||||
Developer Difficulty: | --- | ||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
pavel
2006-03-19 20:25:48 UTC
Rene: I would be glad if you could help me with this stuff. Created attachment 35265 [details]
patch
pjanik: patch attached; reassigning to you for committing/completing it with the rest it in one of your Mac cwses Created attachment 35266 [details]
fixed patch...
Reassign to macport. Do we want this at all? Yes! Universal Binaries will make the life of plain old users easier, and give ooo greater acceptance. +1 for universal I can take this over if no one else wants it. I would also like to see the ability to make all three possibilities in one go - universal, ppc, and intel. I have both architectures and I do see some benefit in the single architecture build. Is anyone else interested in this? I was interested. But I think it doesn't make sense for OOo. My patches are at http://ftp.linux.cz/pub/localization/OpenOffice.org/devel/build/Patches/SRC680/ Files starting with UB-* Feel free to use them. @Michael I already played with them: it builds, but there are still issues ( OpenOffice.org won't launch ) and maybe use system stl could help. I didn't investigate further, but if you are interested, I can give you some hints. this is obsolete, no? wontfix -> closed |